Want this question answered?
Arguments against economic integration world leader command?
Technology that creates the ability for greater connectivity has an impact on globalization. Developing nations have the ability to compete on the International marketplace against larger firms.
There are probably more than four hindrances to globalization. One hindrance to globalization is Cultural/Local resistance. Its arguable that globalization is a phenomenon in which "Western" culture is imposed on other cultures since the first world countries pushing forward globalization are most often Western themselves. Thus local resistance can build up to prevent the homogenization of their culture to that of the ones imposed by the forces of globalization like media, international companies like Nike, and fashion among many others. The homogenizing forces of globalization are seen as corrupting and damaging to the cultural integrity of the region. An example of such resistance can be found in Iran today where the fundamentals of Islam are stressed against the imposing "global-western" pressures across much of the rest of the Middle East. Furthermore, terrorist movements like Al-Qaeda are similar forms of resistance and countercurrents to globalization and western ideas of enlightenment and modernity.
With the advent of globalization, countries who are in disadvantageous position, are rushing to markets where cheap labor is available, to have their products competitive. Even President Barrack Obama had to warn the U.S. Companies against their business process outsourcing to India, to get rid of high labor cost in U.S. and threatened to impose tax on them. Thus, in globalization only the cost factor is primary and the plight of labor force whether domestic or in alien country is secondary.
monopoly is a game and it is long and boring. It is stupid just like your face.
Arguments against economic integration world leader command?
One argument against globalization is that their is more disparity of wealth now. Other arguments against globalization are that the economics of other countries can affect America and countries can lose jobs when other countries will do the work for less.
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
To place in front of, or over against; to set opposite; to exhibit., To put in opposition, with a view to counterbalance or countervail; to set against; to offer antagonistically., To resist or antagonize by physical means, or by arguments, etc.; to contend against; to confront; to resist; to withstand; as, to oppose the king in battle; to oppose a bill in Congress., To compete with; to strive against; as, to oppose a rival for a prize., To be set opposite., To act adversely or in opposition; -- with against or to; as, a servant opposed against the act., To make objection or opposition in controversy.
Opposition is a movement against something.
try doing some reseach on arguments against it then reverse it
Opposition just means being against something.
It means you are in opposition to something or someone.
If you are anti something, you are against it. Being anti something means having opposition or opposition to that particular thing.
There are no real, good arguments against planning. Having a plan is important in many cases.
are you for or against voluntary work
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.