Because most of it was slave labor. And slave labor was in the process of being abolished.
The tariffs protected Northern industry from cheap imports. The South had virtually no industry, and cheap imports suited them very well. So with a Northern majority in Congress, the tariffs looked like the North taxing the South. This pulled the two sides further apart.
investment is part of output, so if we have a low investment, we will have a lower GDP holding all other factors constant.
The south's greatest weakness was its economy, the north barricaded them on the seaboard, so the south had no money from their cotton industry. They also had no food for their soldiers because the food factories were in the north.
The North wanted to proetct its industry against foreign imports. The South only had cotton, and needed all kinds of imports. So the Tariffs were seen as a tax by the North on the South.
An investment is considered risky if the probability of loss is high. However, risky investments can also produce dramatic gains. So if you want to speculate that a given risky investment will pay off, you have to balance that against the possibility that you will lose some or all of the investment. That's why rash or all-or-nothing investment strategies lead to ruin.
It wanted to protect its industry by levying tariffs (taxes) on cheap imports. The South had very little industry, and needed cheap imports. So the tariffs looked like a tax by the North on the South.
Tariffs on imports, which the South needed, having so little industry. Later, South Carolina became the first state to secede, following Lincoln's election on a ticket of no new slave-states.
Many South African hope so, in order for South Africa to this it requires more investment.
Yes, mostly cotton plantations. As the planters grew rich in the cotton boom, they began to fantasise that they were feudal aristocrats, and they discouraged their sons from going into industry. So the South had very little industry when the Civil War started, and this put them at a disadvantage.
Yes - with tariffs on imports. It was the South that mostly needed the imports, having no industry of its own. So it felt like the North taxing the South.
It had very little at the beginning, so it had to improvise. Against all its disadvantages (such as the blockade), the South displayed great ingenuity in setting up an industrial infrastructure. For example, it built the first submarine ever to sink a warship.
a large diamond industry is what keeps South Africa afloat
The South didn't have much industry, it was mainly a farming area. Their main export was cotton, I believe another top export was tobacco. The South didn't farm very much food, and with little industry they didn't have basic supplies like shoes. So the South needed to keep their ports open so they could receive food, shoes, and other important supplies. As a side note: The North did a pretty good job of blocking off Southern ports so the South experienced much hardship during the war.
The North wanted tariffs on imports, to protect its manufacturing industry. The South had virtually no manufacturing industry, so it wanted cheap imports.
It was the mainstay of the cotton industry.
Southerners were plantation farmers, so they didn't invest in the industry. Instead, they invested in slaves.
To protect manufacturing industry from cheap foreign imports. Industry was mostly in the North. The South wanted cheap imports. So the tariffs looked like the North taxing the South.