Want this question answered?
Headline inflation is what's important to the average person. It accounts for the rise in the cost of living. Core inflation, on the other hand, is what's important to economists and the Federal Reserve, who sets monetary policy. Core inflation accounts for the rise in the cost of goods EXCLUDING food and energy prices. Why do economists and the Fed prefer core inflation metrics? Because food and energy prices are much more volatile, and that volatility is often caused by sudden events such as natural disasters or geopolitical unrest. By focusing on non-food, non-energy inflation (core inflation), the Fed strips away temporary "distractions" to focus on the true interplay of supply and demand in the domestic product markets. This supply/demand interplay is crucial in setting sound monetary policy.
It is not that Keynes directly the amount of attention given to microeconomics, rather his work and modelling was about macroeconomic matters, and since these are more profound, it was natural for many economists to concentrate on these issues.
Environmental economics is a subfield of economics that deals with environmental issues. One main focus of environmental economics is market failure. Market failure is when the markets fail to efficiently allocate resources.
Which level does macroeconomics focus on?
To someone unfamiliar with economics, this answer is likely to be difficult to understand, so I'll try to answer it as simply as possible. I would imagine, however, for you to be asking this question, to have an above average background in economics, but just in case, I'll go through the basic causes of inflation. Inflation is known to economists as a general, persistent and appreciable rise in the cost of goods and services, and is quantified through the calculation of a consumer price index (CPI). There are two key types of inflation which are characterised by their causes, which are : Demand pull-which is simply defined as "too much money chasing too few goods", relating to the level of aggregate demand in the economy and/or the demand for labour(related to cost push) and/or the money supply in the economy. This inflation occurs when there are bottlenecks in supply relative to demand, and thuse prices go up. And, Cost push, which is related to the cost of factors of production, for example, labour, capital and company regulations. Given that much of monetary policy (policies which control the supply of money and the availability of credit) hinges upon demand management, demand pull inflation is often the key focus of counter-inflationary policy. This is also because the demand pull effect is easier to manage and more predictable, also being a more recurrent cause of inflation. The simplest way to answer your question explicitly is to state that, 2-3% inflation is considered to be positive, as it has negligible redistributive and output related ramifications. Furthermore, it is a sign of sustainable growth, suggesting that demand is slightly outstripping supply, and hence, there is still a manageable level of economic activity. In essence, 2-3% inflation is associated with growth and can be managed to the benefit of the macroeconomy. Furthermore, there are little inherent benefits associated with 0% inflation, when one considers the sizeable input required to balance the demand and supply sides of the economy. The market mechanism is dynamic and subject to a significant multiplicity of factors and hence, it is infeasible to retain this inflation figure. In Australia, as of September 2009 headline inflation was approximately 3%. This is seen as the maximum threshlod limit of inflation. However, in developing responsible monetary policy, the underlying figure of 3.9% should be considered also. I hope that answers your question. I've included quite a bit of extra info here, and I apologise if you were just looking for a concise answer, but saying that, this is the fifth time I've heard this question, so I figured more may look to this in the future. Thanks.
If they deal with the issue of inflation, other issues may resolve themselves in the process.
There are numerous magazines that focus on women's issues and interests. Some of the most popular include Good Housekeeping, Cosmopolitan, Woman's World, and Redbook.
Virus-L and computer virus are discussions forums which focus on computer virus issues
Focus group.
it was supposed to offer professionalism and allow for more focus on complex issues it was supposed to offer professionalism and allow for more focus on complex issues riddoch
His resignation.
the organisational issues of the purchasing function focus on the purchasing function of an organisation in a decentralisation or centralise manner.
Focus on the issues Speak Clearly Listening
2010 ford focus!I agree. A Dodge Neon is built like, and rides like, a box.
Generalization
focus on operational or tactical issues
Because of its focus on workers' issues