no
it makes led less developed and causes problems
In a command economy, the government centrally plans and controls economic activities, which limits the scope for individual entrepreneurship. Resources, production, and distribution are managed by the state, reducing the incentives for private enterprise and innovation. As a result, individual entrepreneurs have little freedom to make independent business decisions or pursue new opportunities, making their role less significant in driving economic growth.
It would lead to less demand for farms is that when farmers don't have the right amount of cotton they need they can loose demand for it
By simple supply and demand theory. The more demand, or the less supply, will lead to higher prices. The less demand, or more supply, will lead to lower prices.
Answer this question… It allowed for much less individual freedom.
more economic freedom, less personal freedom.
more personal freedom, less economic freedom.
They shrink it. Republicans want individual freedom and less government control.
no
it makes led less developed and causes problems
Answer this question… It allowed for much less individual freedom.
To make globalisation fairer TNCs need to be less greedy and work with people like their workers, consumers and government. This would help by the TNCs realising how they influence countries and different people.
Compulsory voting can limit individual freedom and may lead to uninformed or coerced voting. This can result in a less engaged electorate and potentially skewed election outcomes. It may also undermine the principle of voluntary civic participation in a democracy.
A Democratic Republican was in favor of individual freedom foremost, and was less worried about government.
"Less regulated" refers to a situation where there are fewer rules, restrictions, or oversight governing a particular industry, sector, or activity. This could lead to more freedom for businesses or individuals to operate as they see fit, but could also potentially result in less protection for consumers or the environment.
This is a general question and the answer fits most nation's economies. This answer will pertain to individual freedom rather than corporate or government, both are affected by taxes. But back to the individual. With low taxes individuals keep more of their monies and thus have more economic freedoms to purchase or place into savings funds that with high taxes could not be as easily done. Thus the other part of the answer is almost already said. That is with high taxes, individuals have less economic freedoms, as they have less money.