0
What else can I help you with?
Can a program be correct and still not exhibit good quality?
Good quality is broad concept. The correctness of program could not be the only one factor to judge good quality of program.
But still is it correct English?
it is not correct English, you rather say still
Is the wiggles exhibition still on?
The Wiggles Exhibition is still on. the Wiggles Exhibit goes from September 2011- September 2013
Which is correct - you are interested in working on the presidential campaign if the opportunity still exist OR if the opportunity still exists?
The second one is correct: "If the opportunity still exists."
Is there any future for program developers?
yes there is still a future for program developers
Is Paul Wappat's program still on?
wappsat.praqramlari
Can you still get the ambassadors program after august 2011?
no
Is it still correct to address an envelope to a little boy with Master?
I think that Master is correct
What is grammatically correct still in process or still in processing?
You would say that something is still in process.
Can a program be correct and still not reliable?
It depends on what you mean by the words "correct" and "reliable". A typical notion of correctness means that the program, when executed correctly, does what you want it to do. Similarly, you might want reliability to mean that every run of the program does its job. This being accepted, it is possible for a "correct" program to prove unreliable, as when you have gamma rays hitting the memory chips and corrupting data. Such cases, while extremely rare (modern digital circuits have extraordinary ECC mechanisms), do occur in practice. An example was when a single bit error in one of Amazon's servers led to a domino crash, and within a few minutes, Amazon's S3 services were down. Of course, the Amazon example is probably controversial, because fault tolerance is a correctness requirement for their engineers. It is also for this reason that you'll find building ICs for rockets and satellites is a much harder job than building ICs for everyday use --- the ability to withstand high radiation without corruption being the extra requirement. At the other end of the spectrum, you have "incorrect" programs which have nevertheless proved extremely reliable. I'm referring to the whole field of randomized algorithms. While these algorithms, strictly speaking are incorrect, they return the correct answer with high probability. Run sufficiently many times, the probability of these algorithms making is a mistake is less than the probability of your being struck by lightning. Unlike correct unreliable programs, these find use literally everywhere in the computer industry.
What is the name for a computer program that runs within another application?
I think you may be talking about a Sub Program, which is actually still part of the main program.
Can you find a tiger shark in the zoo?
Yes they do still exist but they are still on the endangered species list !!!
