answersLogoWhite

0

Frontiers journals are not generally considered predatory in the academic publishing industry. They are known for their rigorous peer review process and high-quality publications.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

5mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Are MDPI journals considered predatory in the academic publishing industry?

MDPI journals are not generally considered predatory in the academic publishing industry.


What is the reputation of the Frontiers journal in the academic community?

The Frontiers journal is generally well-regarded in the academic community for its rigorous peer-review process and high-quality research publications.


What is the reputation of David Publishing Company in the academic publishing industry?

David Publishing Company has a mixed reputation in the academic publishing industry, with some critics questioning the quality and credibility of its publications.


When did the practice of peer review in academic publishing begin?

The practice of peer review in academic publishing began in the 17th century.


What does "in press" mean in the context of academic publishing?

"In press" in academic publishing means that a paper has been accepted for publication in a journal but has not been officially published yet.


What has the author Dawne Clarke written?

Dawne Clarke has written: 'A sociological study of scholarly writing and publishing' -- subject(s): Academic writing, Scholarly publishing 'A sociological study of scholarly writing and publishing' -- subject(s): Academic writing, Scholarly publishing


What are the reviews for Lambert Academic Publishing?

Reviews for Lambert Academic Publishing are mixed, with some authors reporting positive experiences with the publishing process and distribution, while others have raised concerns about the company's marketing practices and lack of editorial support. It is important for authors to carefully research and consider all aspects before choosing to publish with Lambert Academic Publishing.


What are the limitations of the traditional peer review process in academic publishing?

The limitations of traditional peer review in academic publishing include potential bias, lack of transparency, and delays in the publication process.


What does the term "article in press" signify in academic publishing?

The term "article in press" in academic publishing refers to a manuscript that has been accepted for publication in a journal but has not yet been formally published.


What does the term "in press" signify in the context of academic publishing?

The term "in press" in academic publishing means that a research paper has been accepted for publication in a journal but has not been officially published yet.


What is the difference between a corrigendum and an erratum in academic publishing?

A corrigendum is a notice of a correction made by the author after publication, while an erratum is a notice of a mistake made by the publisher after publication in academic publishing.


What is the impact of the eLife new policy on academic publishing practices?

The eLife new policy has a significant impact on academic publishing practices by promoting open access, transparency, and reproducibility in research.