You should research then then debate on the theory, that way, you have a stronger foundation to build your argument.
Was 1830.
yes they can be changed!Scientific models change to reflect ongoing research to explain discrepancies in current theory versus actual experimental results.
r u 4m Ryan kandivli???
The nature versus nurture debate helps to examine the extent to which genetics and environment shape psychological concepts and processes. It allows us to understand how both biological factors (nature) and environmental influences (nurture) contribute to psychological development and behavior. By considering this debate, we can gain insights into the complex interactions between genetics and environment in shaping psychological outcomes.
Determinants of behavior: The unconcsious versus environment
It's the same I think
A decision on slavery and a debate on states rights versus federal rights.
Psychologists, biologists, geneticists, and sociologists are all interested in resolving the nature versus nurture debate. This debate focuses on the relative influence of genetics (nature) and environment (nurture) on human behavior and development. Scientists from various fields aim to understand the complex interactions between genes and the environment in shaping individual traits and characteristics.
The five Galtonian traits are longevity, weight, height, intelligence, and temperament. These traits were studied by Sir Francis Galton in his research on heredity and the nature versus nurture debate.
It is the question whether personality is determined by nature, as in your genes, or nurture, the environment that you grew up in.The nature versus nurture debate, is a debate concerning the importance and influence that genetic make-up has on an individual versus the experiences they have involving their family, education, etcetera, and how these influences impact that person.
nature apex confirmed
nurture -apex :)