No, not all English sentences require an object. Some sentences can be complete with only a subject and a verb. Objects are only necessary in sentences that involve transitive verbs, where the action is done to someone or something.
No. < That was a sentence without a verb.
give 5 sentences of direst object
Standard English users can begin sentences with coordinating conjunctions like and, but, and or, but orprobably is less frequently used than and or but. Some purists object even to using and or but, and it is always safest to humor them, especially in academic writing.
The Spanish word "lo" can be translated to "it" in English. It is often used as a direct object pronoun in Spanish sentences.
No. In fact most sentences with direct objects don't have indirect objects.I ate the ice cream.I kicked the ball.Even sentences that do have an indirect object can usually be rewritten to use a prepostional phrase instead.I gave him a dollar.I gave a dollar to him.However, sentences that have an indirect object should always have a direct object.I gave him doesn't make much sense.I gave him a dollar is better.
diectly translate it into English is ""i love"" always followed by a object.
which sentences?
What sentences
Steak is the direct object.
Sentences are always adverse. How'd you like to go to jail? Sentences are always adverse. How'd you like to go to jail?
Yes. Some people say that because a sentence is a full thought, it cannot begin with a conjunction. But these people are ignoring the fact that sentences do not exist in a vacuum, that is, they exist inside a context and link to each other. Good English prose has always allowed sentences to begin with conjunctions when they are connecting with other sentences.