If a monopolist raises his prices above marginal cost, he will increase his profits. This seems like a good thing for the monopolist. However, the down side is that it reduces the well-being of consumers. Most times, the harm to consumers is greater than the gain of the monopolist.
When a price increase has little or no effect on the demand for a product, it is inelastic.
Since P>MC for an oligopoly, the output effect is that selling one more unit at the sales price will increase profit.The price effect is that an increase in production will increase the total amount sold, which will decrease the price and decrease the profit on all other units sold.If the output effect is greater than the price effect, the owner will increase production.If the price effect is greater than the output effect, the owner will not increase production (and may even decrease production).Oligopolists will continue to increase or decrease production until these marginal effects balance.
The Price of the gasoline with increase : D
Increase in supply in the face of steady demand will result in lower price.
No, monopolists are not price takers like competitive firms. In a competitive market, firms accept the market price as given and cannot influence it due to many competitors. In contrast, a monopolist has market power and can set prices above marginal cost, as they are the sole supplier of a good or service, allowing them to influence the market price.
it will increase the price of bonds
help me
income effect
No, the substitution effect is not always negative. It refers to the change in quantity demanded of a good when its price changes, leading consumers to substitute it with other goods. While a price increase typically results in a decrease in quantity demanded (a negative substitution effect), a price decrease can lead to an increase in quantity demanded, which can be viewed as a positive effect. Thus, the direction of the substitution effect depends on the nature of the price change.
A 2 percent increase in the price of food is likely to have a larger effect on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) compared to a 3 percent increase in the price of diamond rings. This is because food is a staple item that is consumed by the majority of the population, making its price change more impactful on overall living costs. In contrast, diamond rings are luxury items purchased by a smaller segment of the population, so their price fluctuations have a limited effect on the CPI.
The law of supply says; The supply will be increase due to increase in price and vice versa. The reason is that the seller will maximize his profit.
decompose total effect of price increase for an inferior good and giffen into substitution and income effect, in each case derive both the ordinary and compensated demand curve