0
To identify the premises of an argument you must accomplish several things...
One: Approach arguments differently than the common perception. Traditionally most people believe that arguments consist of a stern or often violent outburst, this is not an argument, this is a quarrel or disagreement. An argument should be separated from emotional content. A genuine argument is a group of one or more meaningful, declarative sentences or "Propositions" with the intent to present a reason or determination which is known as a "Conclusion", and the statements to support that conclusion.
Two: A genuine argument is solely based in logic. To understand the the types of logic will help you understand the types of genuine arguments, and make the premises easier to identify.
- Deductive Logic, means determining the conclusion through a logical series of preconditions. Think of these as logical steps. When this happens that happens, that has happened, therefore this has happened. For example; To make wine someone has to, pick grapes, crush the grapes, and ferment the Grape Juice. I have wine, therefore someone picked the grapes, crushed the grapes and fermented the grape juice. In this example the wine itself is the result or the Conclusion, so the Precondition for this conclusion are the steps to make the wine.
- Inductive Logic, means determining the Rulenecessary for the conclusion based on the precondition. For example; wine has an alcohol content, the preconditions for wine are picking grapes, crushing grapes, and fermenting grape juice. Whenever fermentation occurs alcohol develops. The presence of alcohol in wine is a result of the precondition of the fermentation process who's rule is the development of alcohol.
- Abduction Logic, Means determining the precondition based on the conclusion. This is not a factual logic only what most likely occurred based on the conclusion. There is wine in the bottle, therefore someone may have picked grapes, crushed grapes, and fermented grapes. You see this form of logic often in police work, where the actual preconditions are unknown but the conclusion is definite.
Three: Understand the Arguments, Genuine arguments consist of two categories One is the Informal Argument, and the other is a Formal argument. Informal arguments are general discourse and presented in plain language, while formal arguments have a nearly mathematical logic to them consistent with implication and inference. What is implied and what can be inferred. Remember an arguments has only one conclusion strictly speaking, but a discussion or paragraph may be much more complex, conclusions can often become the basis for premises for other arguments. Focus on one argument at a time. Look at the logic and determine the precondition. The precondition in logic equals the premises of an argument.
An example argument:
In the old days wine makers would hire workers to crush grapes with their feet, Today they use big machines to crush grapes. There is allot more wine being made today than in the old days.
The conclusion is, today there is more wine being made than in the old days. We can apply deductive logic to this and say, "By crushing grapes with feet, we get less wine than by crushing grapes with a big machine, we have more wine now than we did when we crushed grapes with feet, therefore we must have used a big machine." we determined the conclusion based on the supporting statements or premises. The premises is that using big machines to crush grapes makes more wine.
What else can I help you with?
How do you add a premises and conclusion to incomplete argument?
To add a premises and conclusion to an incomplete argument, first identify the main point being made. Then, find additional supporting reasons or evidence that lead to that main point to form the premises. Finally, state a clear conclusion that follows logically from the premises provided. Make sure the premises adequately support the conclusion for a strong and coherent argument.
How do you identify a strong or weak argument?
A valid argument is one in which the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion. An invalid argument is one in which the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. In invalid arguments, the conclusion does not follow with strict necessity from the premises, even though it is claimed to.
Is an argument valid or invalid?
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
What is the conclusion that can be drawn if all the premises of an argument are true?
If all the premises of an argument are true, then the conclusion drawn from those premises is likely to be valid and logically sound.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
What are the steps to evaluate an argument?
To evaluate an argument, first identify the main claim and the supporting premises. Next, assess the validity of the reasoning by checking for logical consistency and identifying any fallacies. Consider the strength and relevance of the evidence provided, and finally, evaluate the argument's overall soundness by determining whether the premises genuinely support the conclusion.
What are the two parts of an argument?
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
What makes a valid deductive argument?
A valid deductive argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. The form of the argument must be such that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
If a deductive argument is valid and its premises are true?
If a deductive argument is valid and its premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This is because the structure of the argument guarantees that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must follow logically.
How can you tell if an argument is valid?
An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This can be determined by evaluating the logical structure of the argument.
How does the presence of a false conclusion in a strong argument indicate that not all of its premises can be true?
The presence of a false conclusion in a strong argument suggests that at least one of its premises must be false, as a strong argument should lead to a true conclusion based on true premises.
Can a deductively argument have false premises?
Yes, a deductive argument can have false premises. However, the conclusion does not follow logically if the premises are false, making the argument unsound.
