There is no specific rule in English for forming the plural of a noun that ends with an "o". Common nouns that end with "o" add either an "s" or an "es" to the end of the word.A proper noun ending with "o" can form the plural with either ending: Tisos or Tisoes.A person with the name "Tiso" may have a preference of their own.
To pluralize a last name, generally add an "s" to the end of the name without changing the spelling of the name. If you are talking about a whole family, such as the Smith family, call them "the Smiths." Names that end in sh, ch, s, or z add -es to form the plural: the Marshes; the Binches; the Joneses; the Katzes
Fournesses is the plural of Fourness
Most times, you add -es. You leave the last s on the name and add the -es.
It would be... example: Johnsons the correct spelling would be Johnsons'
The plural of the last name "Gross" is "Grosses." When forming plurals for surnames, typically an "s" or "es" is added, depending on the ending of the name. Therefore, you would refer to multiple individuals with the last name Gross as the Grosses.
"Es apellido" translates to "last name" or "surname" in English.
The plural is Welches. It is perfectly regular: a noun ending in a 'ch' sound forms the plural by adding 'es', as in mulch, mulches.
"Mi apellido es" is a Spanish phrase that translates to "my last name is" in English. It is used to state or introduce one's family name or surname.
Yes, it is correct to refer to a family with the last name Rich as the Riches. When using a last name to describe a family collectively, the plural form is typically created by adding an "es" or "s," depending on the name's ending. Therefore, "the Rich family" can be informally referred to as "the Riches."
say "mi apellido es (then your last name)"
It should be: ¿Cuál es su / tu / vuestro apellido?