0
If you use a summary note in a research paper you will not be guilty of plagiarism true or false?
False. Using a summary note in a research paper does not automatically exempt you from plagiarism. If the summary is based on someone else's ideas or work, proper citation is still required to credit the original source. Failing to do so can still result in academic dishonesty.
What else can I help you with?
True is to false as guilty is to?
True is the opposite of false, so the opposite of guilty would be innocent.
True or false Atticus believes that Tom Robinson is guilty of the crime?
false
What was the verdict in the Casey Anthony Trial?
Casey Anthony was found Not Guilty of all federal charges against her, and found Guilty on the misdemeanor charges of providing false information to law enforcement. The verdicts on all charges are as follows: First-Degree Murder: Not Guilty Aggravated Child Abuse: Not Guilty Aggravated Manslaughter: Not Guilty 4 Charges of Providing False Information to Law Enforcement: Guilty
Is Accumulated Depreciation closed to the Income Summary account?
false
For a or subsequent conviction of a DUI you are guilty of a 3rd degree felony?
false
For a or subsequent conviction of a DUI you are guilty of a 3rd degree felony.?
false
Is it true or false A cover letter should be a summary of your resume?
True. A cover letter should be a summary of your resume.
Is research only done after a hypothesis is written?
false
Are Colloquialisms acceptable in a research paper?
I just had this question in school as a true or false and it is false. Colloquialisms are not acceptable in a research paper.
Was The OED was printed after two years of research True False?
false
Does Plagiarism entail violation of intellectual property laws?
Not always. Plagiarism is making a false claim that you created something original. If you copied a public domain source, it is not a copyright infringement, but still plagiarism. For example, you download a NASA photograph (all works created by the US government are public domain in the USA), modify it and submit it to a photo contest as your original work. That is plagiarism, not copyright infringement.
Can a religion be guilty of false advertising?
That depends. It would not be considered false advertising to asert that God (or gods) exists, that Jesus loves you, or that you will be saved by attending church or contributing to the church funds. Like all organisations, a religion could be guilty of false advertising if it promised investors a financial return that it knew would not be achieved. Perhaps it could be guilty of false advertising if it claimed to heal illnesses through faith, but such cures never seem to eventuate. In short, there would have to be secular reasons to support a claim of false advertising.
