In Zimbardo's classic Stanford prison experiment, participants succumbed to the power of
the experiment
the experiment
Many of the participants of the Stanford Prison Experiment have gone on to lead successful lives in various fields, while some have faced challenges related to their experiences in the study. Some have become prominent figures in academia, psychology, and other professions, while others have chosen to remain private about their involvement in the experiment.
The independent variable is the conditions the participants are assigned to- either the prisoner or the guard. The dependent variable is the participants resulting behavior.
The Stanford Prison Experiment has raised ethical concerns due to the psychological harm experienced by participants. The study lacked proper informed consent and debriefing procedures, which are essential ethical standards in research involving human subjects. Additionally, the power dynamics established in the study were not adequately monitored, leading to the mistreatment of participants.
The researchers overseeing the Stanford Prison Experiment had the most influence on the experiment itself. They designed the study, recruited participants, and determined the parameters of the simulation. Their decisions ultimately shaped the outcome of the experiment and its implications.
Confounding variables in the Stanford prison experiment could include the psychological characteristics of the participants, such as pre-existing attitudes towards authority or aggression. Additionally, the specific conditions in which the experiment took place, such as the lack of oversight and the power dynamics between the guards and prisoners, could also be considered confounding variables that influenced the outcomes of the study.
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo in 1971 at Stanford University.
They felt as if they were truly prisoners (Apex)
The Stanford prison experiment demonstrated in-group bias by showing how participants assigned the role of guards quickly identified with their group and exhibited prejudice and discrimination towards the "prisoner" group. This bias led to dehumanization and mistreatment of the prisoners, showcasing the power of group dynamics in influencing behavior.
the Stanford prison experiment
Zimbardo's role in the Stanford Prison Experiment was as Superintendent. He was also the man behind the experiment tracking the changes in personally behavior when people were thrown into their role as a prisoner or a prison guard.