Participant and Player.
It means the observer is all knowing. For example, people believe that GOD is an omniscient observer, who sees and knows everything
It removes the possibility of bias in the observer.
An omniscient observer is a hypothetical entity or being that possesses complete knowledge and understanding of all events and information in existence. This concept is often used in philosophy and thought experiments to explore questions of knowledge, perception, and reality.
First person participant refers to experiencing events or situations directly as they happen, while second person observer involves viewing these events or situations from an external perspective without actively participating in them.
The Police helicopter had an observer in addition to the Pilot.The spectator was not a participant just an observer.The observer watched the proceedings and witnessed no foul play.
Cultural anthropology is the field that typically uses ethnography to record the observations of a participant observer in a study. Ethnography involves detailed study and description of a specific cultural group, often through immersion in the community being studied.
A blinded observer is a research participant or evaluator who is unaware of certain key information, such as the purpose of the study or the treatment being administered. This helps minimize bias and ensure the results are more objective.
3rd person is used to refer to somebody or something being spoken about. Its like the observer. You are not allowed to use I or we nor you. "He", "She", "It" and "They" is used in 3rd person. He came to the bar on friday. It flew away during the hurricane. They were having fun She looked sad.
In "Feels Like Spring" by Milton Kaplan, Tommy's narrative is first person participant, where he is directly involved in the events and experiences he is describing. This means that Tommy is an active participant in the story rather than just observing it from a distance.
Participant observation allows researchers to gain deep insights and firsthand experiences, fostering a more nuanced understanding of the social dynamics within a group. However, it can introduce bias and affect the behavior of those being studied due to the observer's presence. Non-participant observation, on the other hand, maintains a level of objectivity and can minimize observer influence, but it may lack the depth of understanding that comes from being embedded in the setting. Ultimately, the choice between the two methods depends on the research goals and the context of the study.
Non-participant, or direct, observation is where data are collected by observing behaviour without interacting with the participants. Participant observation is where data are collected by interacting with, and therefore experiencing, the phenomenon being studied.