No, a newspaper is not typically considered a scholarly source.
No, a blog is generally not considered a scholarly source because it is often written by individuals without formal expertise or peer review.
Yes, an encyclopedia is generally considered a scholarly source because it contains information that has been researched and written by experts in various fields.
Yes, Scientific American is considered a scholarly source due to its reputation for publishing articles written by experts in various scientific fields and undergoing a peer-review process to ensure accuracy and credibility.
No, it is generally not recommended to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
It is generally not acceptable to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
Yes, Elsevier is generally considered a credible source for academic research due to its reputation as a leading publisher of scientific and scholarly journals.
It would still count as a website, but on Easybib there is an exception for citing an online newspaper.
an newspaper article will be an secondary source
Newspapers are generally not considered scholarly sources because they are often written for a general audience and may not undergo the same level of peer review and fact-checking as scholarly sources.
ProQuest is considered a reliable source for academic research because it provides access to a wide range of scholarly journals, articles, and other academic resources that have been peer-reviewed and vetted for quality and credibility.
The Harvard Business Review (HBR) is primarily a practitioner-oriented publication that focuses on business management and leadership topics. While it includes articles by academics and experts, HBR is not considered a scholarly source in the traditional sense, as it does not undergo the rigorous peer-review process typical of academic journals. Instead, it aims to provide insights and practical advice for business professionals. Therefore, while it can be informative and valuable, it should not be relied upon as a scholarly source for academic research.
A newspaper article published in 2008 reporting on an event that occurred at that time would be considered a primary source.