A valid test is not always a reliable test. Validity refers to whether a test measures what it claims to measure, while reliability refers to the consistency of test results over time. For example, a test designed to measure mathematical ability may be valid if it accurately assesses math skills, but if the test yields vastly different scores when taken multiple times by the same individual, it lacks reliability. Thus, a test can be valid in content but still unreliable in execution.
In my view reliable test is always valid.
A bathroom scale that consistently shows your weight as 10 pounds less than your actual weight, but always produces the same result when you step on it multiple times, can be considered reliable (consistent) but not valid (accurate).
LSAT, MCAT, so on
A pre-test was there before the main test in the class. This is an example of the word pre-test.
A test may be reliable but not valid. A test may not be valid but not reliable. For example, if I use a yard stick that is mislabeled to measure the distance from tee to hole in golf on different length holes, the results will be neither reliable nor valid. If you use the same stick to measure football fields that are the same length the result will reliable (repeatable, consistent) but not valid (wrong numbers of yards). There is no test that is unreliable (repeatable, consistent) and valid (measures what we are looking for).
No, methanol will not give a positive result in the iodoform test. The iodoform test is specifically used to detect the presence of compounds with the CH3CO- group in them, such as methyl ketones, which are required for a positive reaction.
IQ constancy means that a personÃ?s score should remain the same if the same or similar test is given a second time. Should the score dramatically change, this would indicate that there are some inconsistencies in the IQ test and it may not be valid.
There is no such valid test, so I would definitely question it.
To debug a flow chart you must start at the beginning and test all possible routes through the flow chart. At each decision point, always test both valid and invalid values. When every path leads to a valid result, the flow chart itself may be deemed valid.
i tremble when i take a test
No
Yes, it would be a valid test.