This is of course purely a matter of opinion... that said, I believe that government must weigh the importance and relevance of anything that it spends money on. If it is funding the project, clearly gov't has a responsibility to ensure that the money is well spent, and that the results and goals of the project are worthy. If the government is not funding the project, and the research does not break any established domestic or international laws, then the government has nothing more to say.
Short Answer = Scientific Research.
for scientific research since their development in the 1940s
Office of Scientific Research and Development
The RAND name is a shortened form of Research and Development. RAND is a non-profit company that is located in Santa Monica. It receives federal funding to provide scientific research, development and analysis for the United States government.
Japan is developing smarter, better and faster ways of scientific research.
obviously they should
obviously they should
Research is characterized by - systematic, objective, reproducible, relevance and control. Scientific exeperiments will create situation so that you as a reasearcher can obtain the particular data needed and can measure the data accurately. Research important areas include marketing, production, banking, materials, human resource development and government.
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation
yes but only under government recognisition
The atomic bomb
The government can take away money if a scientist is not following ethical standards.