The existence of intermediate forms supports the theory of evolution. These transitional forms provide evidence of how species have evolved over time through gradual changes and adaptations. They demonstrate the idea of common ancestry and the gradual development of new species from ancestral ones.
gradualism
Where are you people getting these ill posed questions? What level? Transitional forms! At the species level this would be explained as a rapid (geologically rapid) speciation event followed by years of stasis, where little morphological change is taking place.
This could be the result of punctuated equilibrium, a theory proposing that evolution occurs in rapid bursts separated by long periods of little change. In these bursts, new species emerge quickly, leaving behind few intermediate forms in the fossil record. This pattern can be seen in the rapid evolution of certain species in response to environmental changes or selective pressures.
A lack of transitional forms would have suggested some flaw in the fundamentals of evolutionary theory. At least, we would have expected some transitional forms to be found, if either gradualism or punctuated equilibrium was the correct model for evolution. As it is, more than enough transitional forms have been found to date to satisfy any objective observer.
in the school itself where he is studying
Anaplerotic reactions forms intermediate compounds in biochemical processes.
He believed in the theory of Forms, which suggests that there are abstract, perfect forms or ideas that exist beyond the physical world.
Theory of Forms - 2009 was released on: USA: 2 May 2009 (limited)
A lack of evidence would weaken any theory. But the well known asteroids have well defined orbits.
There have been many fossils of intermediate types discovered that provide strong support for the theory of common descent.
it almost the same but they make the theory more complecated and chalanged