answersLogoWhite

0

When a scientific article is rejected during the peer review process, it is typically sent back to the author with feedback from the reviewers. The author can then revise the article based on the feedback and resubmit it to another journal for consideration.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

5mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What happens if a hypothesis is rejected?

You cant go through the full scientific method process.(Because the 7th step is drawing conclusions & checking whether your hypothesis is right or wrong.)


When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?

Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.


Can a theory be rejected?

Yes, a scientific theory can be rejected if new evidence or observations contradict its predictions or if a more accurate theory is developed. The rejection of a theory is an essential part of the scientific process that helps refine our understanding of the natural world.


Can scientific theories be rejected?

Yes, scientific theories can be rejected if new evidence emerges that contradicts them or if they are no longer able to explain observed phenomena. The process of science involves testing and refining theories based on experimental results and observations, and theories can be revised or replaced as our understanding of the natural world evolves.


What do you call a process that happens over a long period of time shortened?

antizamboniism this is the scientific answer


What is the scientific name for making a copy of the DNA?

This process is called replication and happens in mitosis and meiosis.


What process takes place before an article is published in a scientific journal?

Before an article is published in a scientific journal, it typically goes through a peer review process where experts in the field evaluate the quality and validity of the research. The authors may need to make revisions based on the reviewers' feedback before the article is accepted for publication. Once accepted, the article goes through formatting and proofreading before it is officially published.


Which article outlines the amendment process?

Article V


What article established the amendment process?

Article V


What article deals with amendment process?

Article VI


What is made at the beginning of the scientific process?

Well, the scientific process starts with an observation or an idea, then a hypothesis "To guess what happens when its putted to the test" which is the next step, and finally if the hypothesis is correct it changes the original theory, if wrong you have to start over :)


In a science experiment the answer you predict is called?

The answer you predict before starting the experiment is your hypothesis.