The use of special effects in the movie "Avatar" greatly contributed to its overall success by creating a visually stunning and immersive world that captivated audiences and set a new standard for cinematic technology.
Yes, they did use special effects.
No, like any movie they are special effects.
Probably all of the special effects of course.
Movie special effects refer to work done through a computer after the film is made. For instance in Avatar they shot the entire movie in front of a green screen and then used special effects to add in the scenery and creatures.
For filming, No. The movie Avatar was originally thought of and announced in the mid 1990's. It was only when James Cameron, the director, looked into making it, he realized that the special effects of the time weren't at a good enough level to make the movie. He put it on hold until 2004. So in a sense, it did but filming and special effects took 4 years.
Opinion: I thought that Avatar was much better than the movie 2012. They both had formidable special effects, but 2012's were all overdone. In 2012, all the characters escaped from every scenario within an inch of their lives, which got extremely repetitive. However, in Avatar, the special effects were used in an entirely different way, they actually MADE the movie, as opposed to making it seem cheesy. Much of the acting in 2012 was over-the-top, and all in all, the movie held no higher meaning than big action-y blow ups, one after the other.
Avatar won the Oscar for Visual Effects in 2009.
Because it has good effects
The second worst tv adapted movie, right behind Cheers: the older years, instead of the worst.
over 1,800 stereoscopic, photo-realisticvisual effects shots
Avatar was a CGI (Computer Animated Imaging) film. Basically using a computer they made all those cool special effects everyone is so fond of.
The cast of ITV at the Movies Avatar Special - 2009 includes: Sigourney Weaver as herself Sam Worthington as himself