Plagiarism is when someone uses someone else's work without giving credit, while copyright infringement is when someone uses someone else's work without permission.
I assume you are asking the difference between plagiarism & copyright infringement. While both are essentially the use of someone elses work without permission, the most significant difference is that plagiarism also involves claiming that material as your own work.
Copyright is a legal protection for original works, giving the creator exclusive rights to their work. Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's work without permission or proper credit.
Copyright is a legal protection for original works, giving the creator exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute their work. Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's work without permission or proper credit. Copyright protects the creator's rights, while plagiarism involves stealing someone else's work.
The difference is in the user's intent. Willful infringement means the user planned and intended to violate copyright. Generally a person watching an infringing video on YouTube would be infringing, but a person systematically ripping and uploading thousands of DVDs to a file sharing service would be willfully infringing.
Both are forms of unlicensed copying, but it's possible to have one without the other. An example of copyright infringement without plagiarism would be uploading a track from an album you bought: you're not saying it's yours, but you're still copying it without permission. Plagiarism without copyright infringement would happen when you take materials in the public domain and try to pass them off as your own. Romeo and Juliet? I totally wrote that.
Of course it is. You can use anything in the public domain without asking permission or paying for rights. But there is a distinction between copyright infringement and plagiarism; they are not identical. Taking material from any source, and allowing the appearance that it is your original work, is plagiarism. You might not go to jail for it depending on its extent, but you would surely end any hope of a distinguished academic career.
The complexity of determining the boundaries of copyright infringement spectrum is influenced by factors such as the originality of the work, the extent of similarity between the original and the allegedly infringing work, the purpose and nature of the use, and the potential impact on the market for the original work.
Piracy is a type of copyright infringement. A traditional radio station, for example, would pay a fee to the performing rights organizations for each song played; a pirate radio station operates without a license from the PRO, so artists are not paid when their work is broadcast.
Owning an image or the copyright to an image are the same thing. When you hold the copyright to an image it is yours to do with whatever you will, and you can decide who has permission to use it or not. There is no difference.
the difference between adaptation and plagiarism is: adaptation is delivering or executing something that is done in a new form where plagiarism means using or stealing someones idea without discretion in a literal way of writing, using or producing and presented as your own.
Paraphrasing is when you restate someone else's ideas in your own words, while plagiarism is when you use someone else's ideas or words without giving them credit.
previous answer violated copyright