have children
Influences that encourage people to have children.
Pronatalist ideology is a belief system that promotes and encourages population growth, particularly through childbirth. It typically emphasizes the societal benefits of having more children, such as economic growth, cultural preservation, and the continuation of family lineages. Pronatalist policies may include incentives for parents to have more children and discouragement of voluntary childlessness.
The pronatalist bias- That only "selfish" and unhealthy people do not have children. Society's view that you must have something wrong with you if you don't have children.
Pronatalist forces are societal, economic, or political factors that encourage or promote higher birth rates within a population. These forces can include policies such as pro-natal subsidies, cultural norms that value large families, or incentives for having more children.
A pronatalist policy encourages couples to have more children, therefore increasing fertility and birth rates (eg. France). However the anti natalist policy attempts to reduce birth rates to decrease the country's population (eg. China)
A protagonist is the main character, or i guess character(s) of a novel or anything to be honest. its who the story follows, like the antagonist is the bad guy or opposite.
Pronatalist pressures are societal influences that encourage individuals or couples to have children. Examples include government policies that offer financial incentives, such as tax breaks or parental leave, to families with children, as well as cultural norms that value large families or view parenthood as a key life achievement. Additionally, religious beliefs and community expectations can also promote the idea that having children is a moral or social obligation.
Stephen Lewis is generally considered to be pronatalist in his advocacy for addressing issues related to population and reproductive health, particularly in the context of global health and development. He emphasizes the importance of supporting women's rights, access to healthcare, and family planning, which can lead to healthier families and communities. While he recognizes the challenges posed by population growth, his focus is more on empowering individuals to make informed choices rather than advocating for strict population control measures.
He littered like a sow, even when he didn't have the means to feed them, so in practice he was certainly pro-natalist. Given his ultimate goal of reducing human suffering, he should have been anti-natalist though. But he was too much in love with revolutionary romanticism to be consequential.
It mean what you don't what does it mean.
Mean is the average.