A second and a less radical international-dependence approach to development, which we might call the false-paradigm model, attributes underdevelopment to faulty and inappropriate advice provided by well-meaning but often uninformed, biased, and ethnocentric international "expert" advisers from developed-country assistance agencies and multinational donor organizations. These experts offer sophisticated concepts, elegant theoretical structures, and complex econometric models of development that often lead to inappropriate or incorrect policies. Because of institutional factors such as the central and remarkably resilient role of
traditional social structures (tribe, caste, class, etc.), the highly unequal ownership
of land and other property rights, the disproportionate control by local elites over
domestic and international financial assets, and the very unequal access to credit,
these policies, based as they often are on mainstream, Lewis-type surplus labor or
Chenery-type structural-change models, in many cases merely serve the vested interests
of existing power groups, both domestic and international.
In addition, according to this argument, leading university intellectuals, trade
unionists, high-level government economists, and other civil servants all get their
training in developed-country institutions where they are unwittingly served an
unhealthy dose of alien concepts and elegant but inapplicable theoretical models.
Having little or no really useful knowledge to enable them to come to grips in an effective
way with real development problems, they often tend to become unknowing
or reluctant apologists for the existing system of elitist policies and institutional
structures. In university economics courses, for example, this typically entails the
perpetuation of the teaching of many irrelevant Western concepts and models,
while in government policy discussions too much emphasis is placed on attempts
to measure capital-output ratios, to increase savings and investment ratios, or tomaximize GNP growth rates. As a result, proponents argue that desirable institutional
and structural reforms, many of which we have discussed, are neglected or
given only cursory attention.
the different software engineering paradigms are:- waterfall model prototyping model object oriented model spiral model WINWIN spiral model incremental model evolutionary model Paradigm means how to solve...Types are: Imperitive Paradigm Object Oriented Paradigm Functional Paradigm Logic Paradigm Data Paradigm
This paradigm was called DRM(Deese Roediger McDermott) which addresses the false memory effect and is designed to reliably lead people to insist they have experienced an event.
the Pavlovian Stimulus Model
Spiral Model
The only way that I know paradigm would be used in business would be as in following certain protocol or set as a model for the business.
isa itong paraan ng computer programming
A paradigm is a typical example or pattern of something. It serves as a model or framework that helps shape understanding and behavior within a particular field or context.
sample, model, example, mirror, ideal, criterion, original
(Paradigm - a pattern, model, or example, used also for a set of values) The economic paradigm of communism has not worked very well in practice, although it sounded terrific when Marx first presented it. The rescue workers tried to think of a disaster paradigm that might fit the one they were facing.
This paradigm was called DRM(Deese Roediger McDermott) which addresses the false memory effect and is designed to reliably lead people to insist they have experienced an event.
A paradigm is a model or pattern that represents a typical example of the item or idea. In science, a paradigm is an agreement among scientists that details the scope, problems, and assumptions of a particular discipline. For example, there may be a paradigm for how to treat a particular type of cancer; what drugs to use and in what combinations and for how long, what outcomes may be expected. Our method for the classification of living things ( taxonomy) is a paradigm.
Your paradigm is who you are today based on "data" you have collected through out your whole life. Its your morals, confidence, behavior, knowledge, actions, everything. So, to change your paradigm you would basically have to change some aspect of you. For example: Let's pretend you are a computer and your paradigm is your software. The computer can only display the information to the capacity of the software. So, if you want the computer (you) to do something different, you will need to change your software (paradigm). There are people that specialize in coaching and helping people through this process. If you go to www.ashchi.com you can sign up for a couple of free sessions.