which country have the lowest ecological footprint.
This would have to be the United States still. Despite their efforts the rest of the world is far more conditioned to recyleing than they are.A: A low ecological footprint is good. Actually the US is about the second highest in the world, after Dubai.
The average ecological footprint of a North American is about 8.4 hectares per person. This is significantly higher than the global average of 2.7 hectares per person, indicating a high level of resource consumption and impact on the environment. Efforts to reduce this footprint through sustainable practices and lifestyle choices are important for environmental conservation.
The ecological footprint for an average Canadian is around 8.7 global hectares per person, which is higher than the global average. This footprint takes into account factors like energy consumption, transportation, and food choices. It is important for Canadians to reduce their ecological footprint to help protect the environment and ensure sustainability.
A recent study (WWF Living Planet Report: October 2008) names the top ten countries with the highest ecological footprint per head as: # United Arab Emirates (9.5 global hectares per person) # United States (9.4 gh) # Kuwait (8.9 gh) # Denmark (8.0 gh) # Australia (7.8 gh) # New Zealand (7.7 gh) # Canada (7.1 gh) # Norway (6.9 gh) # Estonia (6.4 gh) # Ireland. (6.3 gh) The lowest country is Malawi, in Africa with an ecological footprint per person of 0.5 gh World total per person: 2.7 gh High-income countries: 6.4 gh Middle-income countries: 2.2 gh Low-income countries: 1.0 gh
The average American ecological footprint is significantly larger than the world's average, primarily due to higher levels of consumption, energy use, and waste generation. While the global average footprint is around 1.7 global hectares per person, the U.S. footprint is approximately 8 global hectares per person. This disparity reflects differences in lifestyle, economic activity, and resource availability, highlighting the environmental impact of high consumption patterns in the U.S. compared to other countries.
A sustainable level of consumption per person is estimated to be around 1.7 global hectares per capita. This takes into account the Earth's biocapacity and the need to reduce our ecological footprint to ensure a sustainable future for all.
The people of Australia have the highest land area per person needed to support their lifestyles based on the concept of the ecological footprint. This is due to factors such as high consumption rates, carbon emissions, and large amounts of land required for agricultural purposes.
Well, friend, the average ecological footprint of a North American is about 8 hectares. That's the amount of land and resources needed to support their lifestyle. It's important to be mindful of our footprint and make small changes to help protect our beautiful planet.
As of the most recent data, East Timor has an average ecological footprint of approximately 1.2 global hectares per person. This figure reflects the country's reliance on natural resources, including agriculture and fishing, while also indicating challenges related to sustainability and resource management. Factors such as population growth and economic development are influencing trends in ecological footprints, highlighting the need for environmental conservation efforts.
Countries with large land areas per person needed to support their lifestyle include Australia, Canada, and the United States. Due to their vast landmass and relatively smaller populations, the ecological footprint per person is higher in these countries compared to smaller, more densely populated nations.
The theoretical average ecological footprint that is considered sustainable is approximately 1.7 global hectares per person. This figure aligns with the Earth's biocapacity, which is the capacity of ecosystems to regenerate resources and absorb waste. To maintain ecological balance, humanity would need to live within this limit, ensuring that resource consumption does not exceed the planet's ability to replenish itself. However, current global averages exceed this sustainable threshold, leading to environmental degradation.
Although Mexico is slightly more developed than China (GDP per capita of 18,900 in Mexico vs. 15,400 in China), it has a lower ecological footprint because China has focused its development in heavy industries like cement and steel, while Mexico has transitioned directly to a services-oriented economy, where the most important "industries" include tourism and retail. This has resulted in an ecological footprint of 2.89 hectares (7.14 acres) in Mexico vs. 3.38 hectares (8.35 acres) for China.