no
A bank's defense, or any property owner's defense, would be that the adverse claimant hasn't met the state requirements for a valid claim.
Consent is a defense to the tort of battery if the plaintiff willingly and knowingly agreed to the harmful or offensive contact that resulted in the battery. If valid consent was given, it can serve as a defense against a claim of battery.
Yes. No
No, only dignity and moral authority. He frequently told the court that they had to convict him as a matter of law.
The only way to avoid having a judgment entered against you is to show up on the hearing date of the lawsuit with a valid defense. Please be advised, the only acceptable defense in a creditor vs. debtor lawsuit is the debtor/defendant bility to provide proof the debt is not valid. As unsympathetic as it seems, loss of employment, illness, not having the financial means to repay, is not considered a legal defense.
Killing someone is not justified unless it is in self-defense or defense of others in imminent danger. If Johnny killed Bob without valid cause, it would not be considered justified.
A defense to a criminal charge typically includes claims such as self-defense, insanity, or alibi. However, "ignorance of the law" is generally not considered a valid defense. This principle holds that individuals are expected to be aware of the laws governing their actions, and claiming a lack of knowledge does not absolve them of responsibility.
Yes. Ignorance is never a valid defense for breaking a law.
No. Mr.Lay was found guilty on all counts for his particpation in the criminal actions that led to collapse of Enron.
No, you cannot consent to murder. Murder is a crime that involves unlawfully killing another person, and consent is not a valid defense in such cases.
An alibi defense specifically asserts that the defendant was elsewhere when the crime occurred, providing evidence to show they could not have committed the offense. In contrast, an affirmative defense acknowledges the defendant committed the act but argues there are valid reasons or justifications for it, such as self-defense or insanity. While both can lead to a not guilty verdict, they approach the defendant's culpability from different angles.