Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences is necessary step in planning, and implementing effective instruction. Understanding how a teacher teaches, and a student learns is advantageous in a balanced literacy program.
The four learning styles as introduced by Carl Jung are mastery (sensing thinking), interpersonal (sensing feeling), understanding (intuitive thinking), and self-expressive (intuitive thinking). Students who learn in a mastery style prefer to know what to do, how to do it, and when it is due (Laureate Education, 2001). Interpersonal learners strive on making personal connections with learning, are humanists, and prefer collaboration. All of their learning is based on themselves and others. The understanding learners rely on critical thinking, and proving their ideas. Finally, self-expressive are described greatly by their label; these students want to express themselves, and engage in creative and imaginative learning (Silver, 2000).
Knowing the learning styles is the first step in implementing effective and efficient instruction. Teachers must first identify students' learning styles, and build on their dominant style. However, students should never be confined to one style. If confinement continues, a dependency will occur (Laureate Education, 2001).
Students obviously learn in different ways. They also are intelligent in different ways. Logical-mathematical students learn systematically. Verbal-linguistic students prefer the use of language. Interpersonal students work well with others. Intrapersonal students rely mostly on themselves. The musical intelligence is good musically and rhythmically. Naturalists prefer to learn about nature. Spatial intelligence refers to the ability to recognize spatial features, and students are usually very good at drawing. Finally, students can be intelligent in regards to bodily kinesthetic abilities (Silver, 2000).
Knowing that students can be intelligent in many different ways enables the teacher to better understand the evidence of learning in their students. In addition to this, the eight intelligences can be integrated, or overlapped, with Jung's four learning styles (Laureate Education, 2001). With successful integration, and accurate diagnoses of learning styles and intelligences, all students will learn. Each learner can reach high expectations, based on standards and objectives.
References
Gardner stated that multiple intelligences are not learning styles and agrees that the idea is incoherent and lacking in empirical evidence
Knowledge of multiple intelligences and learning styles in students can inform curriculum planning by allowing teachers to design a curriculum that caters to diverse ways in which students learn and demonstrate understanding. By incorporating activities that target different intelligences and learning styles, educators can create a more inclusive and engaging learning environment that supports all learners. This approach increases the likelihood of students retaining information and achieving success in their academic endeavors.
Julia Jasmine has written: 'Multiple intelligences activities' -- subject(s): Cognitive learning, Teaching, Cognitive styles, Intellect, Learning 'Science Assessment Grades 3-4' 'Portfolio Assessment for Your Whole Language Classroom' 'Teaching with multiple intelligences'
David G. Lazear has written: 'The Intelligent Curriculum' 'Seven ways of knowing' -- subject(s): Teaching, Cognitive styles, Learning, Multiple intelligences, Intellect 'Teaching for Multiple Intelligence' 'Pathways of Learning' 'The rubrics way' -- subject(s): Intelligence tests, Intellect, Educational tests and measurements, Psychological tests 'Eight ways of teaching' -- subject(s): Cognitive styles, Handbooks, manuals, Handbooks, manuals, etc, Multiple intelligences, Teaching
Individuals have different methods of learning so there is no predominant method, but there is a predominant method of teaching to one modality. Generally, in teaching, visual and auditory are the primary methods of giving students information. This also links into the types of testing and the intelligences that are used in learning. We have a tendency to think that there is one type of intelligence but there are 9 and these are not generally addressed in learning styles. Dr. Howard Gardner of Harvard School of Education has developed the theory of multiple intelligences. Testing is only done with one intelligence and that is usually using the math intelligence. Because of this whole populations of students are forced into the box of using only one intelligence and their learning style/intelligences are discounted. This may cause the student to give up, drop out, or not be successful.
Yes, I find Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences compelling as it broadens our understanding of intelligence beyond traditional measures like IQ. By recognizing diverse forms of intelligence—such as linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, and interpersonal—Gardner's theory validates different strengths and learning styles in individuals. This perspective encourages more personalized education, allowing individuals to thrive in areas aligned with their unique abilities. Overall, it fosters a more inclusive view of human potential.
According to Howard Gardner, intelligence is a multifaceted concept that encompasses a variety of cognitive abilities, rather than a single, fixed attribute. He proposed the theory of multiple intelligences, identifying at least eight distinct types, including linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic intelligences. Gardner emphasizes that individuals possess unique combinations of these intelligences, which shape their learning styles and capabilities. This perspective encourages a broader understanding of human potential beyond traditional measures of intelligence, such as IQ tests.
Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences has had a significant impact on education by challenging the traditional view of intelligence as a single, fixed attribute. Gardner proposed that individuals possess various types of intelligences, such as linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, musical, and interpersonal, among others. This framework encourages educators to adopt diverse teaching methods that cater to different learning styles, thus promoting a more inclusive and effective learning environment. As a result, it has fostered a greater appreciation for the unique strengths of each student in the classroom.
Dr. Gardner's multiple intelligence theory suggests that students have different strengths and learning styles. By recognizing and catering to these diverse intelligences in the classroom, teachers can better engage students and help them learn in ways that suit their individual strengths. This can lead to higher student motivation, achievement, and overall academic success.
In school terms, "MI" could refer to Multiple Intelligences, a theory by Howard Gardner that suggests there are different types of intelligence, such as linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic. Teachers may use this theory to understand and cater to the diverse learning styles and strengths of students.
Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences suggests that individuals possess various types of intelligences, such as linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, and interpersonal, among others. Gardner argues that traditional teaching and testing methods often focus narrowly on linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligences, neglecting the diverse strengths of many students. This one-size-fits-all approach can lead to unfairness, as it fails to recognize and cultivate the unique abilities of learners with different intelligences. As a result, many students may feel undervalued and struggle to succeed in an educational system that does not accommodate their individual learning styles.
Individuals can have multiple learning styles, as they often engage with different modalities simultaneously. The most commonly cited learning styles include visual, auditory, and kinesthetic, but many people exhibit a blend of these styles rather than fitting neatly into one category. Additionally, factors like context, content, and personal preferences can influence how someone learns. Therefore, it's more accurate to view learning styles as a spectrum rather than rigid categories.