... is when an hypothesis moves from an idea into one that can be proven. Always with the proviso that there may yet be avenues unexplored. Until this happens, the facts, as perceived, are authentic.
a person who has a comprehensive and authoritative knowledge of or skill in a particular area
"Authoritative" refers to the characteristic of being believable, and grounded in research, knowledge and fact. "Authoritarian" refers to the characteristic, often used in a political or ideological sense, of being stern, unbending and unwavering from established rules.
In philosophy, knowledge is often classified into two main types: a priori knowledge, which is based on reasoning or intuition rather than experience, and a posteriori knowledge, which is based on empirical evidence or observation. Additionally, some philosophers also consider another type called knowledge by acquaintance, which refers to direct and immediate awareness of something.
The root word of authoritative is "authority."
Authoritative opinion refers to a viewpoint or judgment expressed by an individual or entity recognized for their expertise, knowledge, or credibility in a particular field. This type of opinion is often sought after in contexts such as academia, law, or specialized industries, where the insights of experts can significantly influence decisions or public understanding. Unlike general opinions, authoritative opinions carry weight due to the qualifications and experience of the person or organization providing them.
Authoritative knowledge in philosophy refers to knowledge that is widely accepted as true or valid within a particular philosophical tradition or community. This type of knowledge is often established through a combination of rigorous reasoning, empirical evidence, and consensus among experts in the field.
"Only a court can give an authoritative interpretation of the law." "The government is awaiting an authoritative report on the disaster."
Great leadership skills include:A strong personalityGood organizational skillsA calm but authoritative natureExcellent knowledge of the type of work you are leadingHonestyPunctualityRespect for othersFairness
Non-authoritative means information is provided without official endorsement or validation, and may not be completely accurate or reliable. Authoritative means information comes from a trusted, official source and can be relied upon as accurate and trustworthy.
Emperor Yongle of the Ming Dynasty commissioned the compilation of an authoritative encyclopedia of Chinese learning called the Yongle Encyclopedia. It involved thousands of volumes and aimed to showcase the vast knowledge and intellectual achievements of Chinese civilization.
authoritative statements
== == Below are some recommendations from WikiAnswers Supervisors to help you understand the ins and outs of properly posting and editing Q&As and effectively communicating with other contributors. They are not meant to replace the official WikiAnswers Terms of Use or other WikiAnswers guidelines as presented in our detailed Help Center. Sometimes, contributors will edit an answer claiming to have authoritative knowledge or credentials. Even if some editors could be just expressing real life qualifications, it is not uncommon to make that claim just for imposing a view or for attaining priority at the eyes of an inexperienced editor or supervisor. It is important to remember that in the virtual world, qualifications and authoritative knowledge are difficult to prove without revealing a large amount of personal information and even then, the steps to authenticate those claims are beyond the scope of WikiAnswers. There are some mistakes to be avoided: * Don't assume that an editor has superior knowledge over another, based on claims of authoritative knowledge. * Don't assume that an editor's IP reveals who the editor may be or where he works. Almost anyone can connect using an organization's specific IP - even a janitor or a frequent visitor. There may also be a library or convention center on site where almost anyone can use the connection. IPs are not defining or identifying. * Do not assume that an editor is on the "right" side of a controversy merely because of his claimed authoritative knowledge - and don't protect or side with him, either. * Never assume that one particular editor's contributions are always correct. There are some simple ways to deal with contributions claiming authoritative knowledge: * Suggest that the editor add authoritative links to his contribution. Authoritative sources are those with acquired credibility: universities, serious publications, research organizations, independent studies, etc. Blogs, commercial sites or biased sites are not authoritative sources. * Request that the editor provide his information in an informative tone referring to the sources of such information within the content of the answer (as far as those references don't qualify as SPAM). Remember that WikiAnswers is a place where everyone can help provide answers and is therefore vulnerable to specific agendas and covert advertisement. Keep answers informative, accurate and useful.