I dont know the answer, that's why Im asking you. Can you answer this question? Hmm, if no, don't response anymore. Haha, you've been fooled! This is no answer. It's another question! :P
making an inference
An inference is a conclusion drawn from evidence. The logical connection is clear. An opinion need not be based on evidence, or if it is, may not flow from it logically.
With an observation, you simply take note of your surroundings or what you happen to notice. In an inference on the other hand, the observations are then analyzed and a conclusion is made.
An argument is a set of statements that includes a conclusion and premises intended to support that conclusion. In contrast, inference is the mental process of drawing a conclusion from given premises or evidence. While an argument explicitly presents reasoning to persuade or justify a claim, inference is the cognitive act of arriving at a conclusion based on reasoning or available information. In essence, an argument presents a case, while inference is the process of understanding or deducing that case.
No. A conclusion is based on an experimental result, which attempts to explain how the prior information applies to a given hypothesis.
Inductive Reasoning foo
Inference involves drawing conclusions based on evidence and reasoning, while deduction involves reaching a specific conclusion based on a set of premises or rules.
The answer is: an inference
inference
make a conclusion
An inference is a logical conclusion based on observations. A generalization is a logical conclusion based on many observations and data. The difference between the two is that inferences deal with specifics pertaining to the experiment being worked on, while generalizations are more "general" and apply more to the idea than the specific experiment.
Hypothesis