0
What else can I help you with?
What reason did the Antifederalists give to defend their views on the constitution?
They didn't want a powerful executive to become a king or tyrant.
What reasons did the Antifederalists give to defend their views on the constitution?
They didn't want a powerful executive to become a king or tyrant.
What reasons did the antifederalists give to defend their views one the constitution?
They didn't want a powerful executive to become a king or tyrant.
What were the opposing views regarding ratification of the Constitution?
The group of people who didn't support the Constitution were called Antifederalists. Their main problem with the Constitution was that it didn't have a section that listed their individual rights (Bill of Rights). They also argued that the national government was too strong and were afraid of tyranny. Some even thought that they shouldn't have created a new government. Most Antifederalists were small farmers and debtors. Antifederalists wrote articles and pamphlets and spoke out in state conventions. The articles and pamphlets became known as the Antifederalist Papers.
What position did the federalists take on the constitution?
Federalists wanted the constitution. They supported Federalism (if you couldn't already tell from their label). Antifederalists opposed the Federalist views. They believed that the constitution took to much power from the states and thought it did not guarantee people's rights.
Describe and justify the position of the anti-Federalists regarding the opening phrase of the Constitution you the People of the US?
Differing views on these questions brought into existence two parties, the Federalists, who favored a strong central government, and the Antifederalists, who preferred a loose association of separate states. Impassioned arguments on both sides were voiced by the press, the legislatures, and the state conventions. In Virginia, the Antifederalists attacked the proposed new government by challenging the opening phrase of the Constitution: "We the People of the United States." Without using the individual state names in the Constitution, the delegates argued, the states would not retain their separate rights or powers. Virginia Antifederalists were led by Patrick Henry, who became the chief spokesman for back-country farmers who feared the powers of the new central government. Wavering delegates were persuaded by a proposal that the Virginia convention recommend a bill of rights, and Antifederalists joined with the Federalists to ratify the Constitution on June 25.
How could could the justices have used the part of the constitution in this unit to help defend their views?
You need to answer this question because we don’t do homework and your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills and how well you understood the lesson.
What were Benjamin franklins views on the constitution?
He believed in the constitution, fought for it, lived it.
What are the Republican views on the constitution?
I know some views that the Republicans have on the United States Constitution. I also know twelve ways that the Republicans want to change the U.S. Constitution. There is no straight-on election of senators
What reasons did the federalist give to defend their views on the ratification?
There were a number of reasons that the Federalists gave to defend their views on the ratification. The mainly supported as strong central government and state governments that did not have too much power.
How did the views of Jefferson and Hamilton differ in relation to the Constitutionality of banks?
In general, the views of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton on the application of the Constitution were quite different. In The Bank Debate, the Constitutionality of banks were argued. Jefferson believed in Strict Construction, meaning that if the Constitution didn't directly say something, then they couldn't do it, such as banks, which were not included in the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, on the other hand, believed in Loose Construction, which meant that if the Constitution doesn't say they can't do something, they can. So to Hamilton, banks were Constitutional because they weren't mentioned in the Constitution; for Jefferson banks were unconstitutional for the same reason.
How did Jefferson's views about the constitution's implied powers differ from the views of Alexander Hamilton's?
Jefferson's views differed from Hamilton's because Jefferson believed that implied powers are the powers that are "absolutely necessary" to carry out expressed powers, but Hamilton thought it meant that they were not expressly forbidden in the Constitution.
