0
if the higher social standing people didnt surpress the lower class they wouldn't of had the back bone they needed to make it an empire. the lower class woul dbe free to do as the pleased. and that wouldn't be in the best intrest of the empire of those who didnt have to work to survive
What else can I help you with?
Social inequality was both accepted and resisted in classical civilizations. What evidence might support this statement?
It was mainly on inequalities of both male and female.
What philosophical religious or cultural ideas served to legitimate the class and gender inequalities of classical civilizations?
In classical civilizations, philosophical ideas such as Confucianism in China emphasized hierarchical social structures, reinforcing class distinctions. Additionally, in Ancient Greece and Rome, Stoicism and natural law theories were used to justify gender inequalities by promoting the idea of women's inherent inferiority. These beliefs were often grounded in cultural norms and traditions that upheld the status quo of the time.
What is the removal of social and economic inequalities?
It is to remove inequalities from the economy
What is radical humanism?
Radical humanism is a philosophical stance that emphasizes the inherent dignity, worth, and potential of every individual, advocating for their empowerment and liberation from oppressive social structures. It seeks to address systemic inequalities and challenge dominant power structures through progressive and human-centered approaches to social change and justice.
What was an indicator of a classical civilization?
An indicator of a classical civilization is the development of complex social structures, including stratified social classes and specialized occupations. Additionally, advancements in governance, such as codified laws and administrative systems, often emerged in these societies. Furthermore, classical civilizations typically exhibited significant achievements in arts, architecture, and science, reflecting their cultural sophistication and intellectual pursuits.
What does radical mean in a form of social studies?
In social studies, "radical" refers to ideas, movements, or changes that advocate for significant, often fundamental transformations in society, politics, or economics. It typically implies a departure from traditional norms and practices, seeking to address systemic injustices or inequalities. Radical perspectives may challenge established power structures and propose new frameworks for understanding and organizing society. These views can manifest in various forms, including political activism, social movements, and revolutionary ideologies.
When was Social Democrat Radical Party created?
Social Democrat Radical Party was created on 1863-12-27.
When did Independent Radical Social Democratic Party end?
Independent Radical Social Democratic Party ended in 1924.
When was Independent Radical Social Democratic Party created?
Independent Radical Social Democratic Party was created in 1921.
How do social divisions relate to social inequalities?
Social divisions refer to the categorization of people based on characteristics such as race, gender, or class. These divisions often lead to social inequalities, as certain groups may face discrimination, limited opportunities, or unequal access to resources based on their social category. Addressing social divisions is crucial in reducing social inequalities and promoting a more equitable society.
What are radical leaders?
Radical leaders are individuals who advocate for significant, often revolutionary changes in political, social, or economic systems. They typically challenge the status quo and promote ideologies that seek to address perceived injustices or inequalities. These leaders can emerge in various contexts, ranging from political movements to social justice initiatives, and often inspire passionate followings. Their approaches can vary widely, from nonviolent activism to more militant strategies.
How classical liberalism differs from contemporary liberalism?
Classical liberalism emphasizes limited government intervention in the economy, individual rights, and free markets, while contemporary liberalism supports government intervention to address social and economic inequalities, and places a stronger emphasis on collective welfare and social justice. Classical liberalism is rooted in the ideas of individual liberty and minimal state interference, while contemporary liberalism seeks to use government to address societal issues and promote equality.
