Psychologists may use deception in research to prevent participants from altering their behavior based on knowledge of the study's true purpose, which helps ensure the validity of the results. Deception can create more naturalistic conditions that reflect genuine responses, allowing researchers to study phenomena that might be influenced by participants' awareness. Ethical guidelines require that such deception is minimized, justified by the potential benefits of the research, and that participants are debriefed afterward to explain the true nature of the study.
It is never ethical to use deception in sociological research, because it can have irreversible consequences on somebody.
It depends on the research. If you intend on using deception, make sure you weigh the costs of the research and the benefits that could result from it.
Deception in research is permitted when it is justified by the study's potential benefits, and when it does not cause significant harm to participants. Researchers must ensure that the deception does not violate ethical standards, including informed consent, and that participants are debriefed afterward to clarify the true nature of the study. Additionally, deception should be minimized and only used when alternative methods are not feasible. Ethical review boards often assess the appropriateness of deception in research proposals.
Information on deception can be found in books such as The Art of Deception and Lying in the Laboratory: Deception in Human Research from a Psychological, Philosophical, and Theological Perspectives.
While Milgram's research on obedience provided important insights into human behavior, the use of deception and stress on subjects raises ethical concerns. It is essential to consider whether the benefits of the research justify the potential harm caused to participants, and to ensure that future studies prioritize informed consent and minimize harm.
Deception is a very common, and necessary, practice in research. All institutions must have a Human Subjects Review Board (HSRB) to evaluate an experiment and assess whether the deception in the experiment is within a reasonable realm based on certain criteria. Without deception in research, it would be impossible to get the necessary data. Also, a participant must be debriefed as to what the deception was after the experiment.
Benevolent deception refers to the practice of withholding information from patients for their perceived benefit, often seen in medical ethics. In the case of Henrietta Lacks, her cancer cells were taken without her knowledge or consent, and she was not informed about their use in groundbreaking research. This raises ethical questions about autonomy, consent, and the impact of such deception on patients and their families, highlighting the need for transparency in medical practices. Lacks' story has since prompted discussions about informed consent and the rights of individuals in medical research.
Deception is the use of deceit or trickery. It's fooling somebody to act, believe, etc. when it is really false.
there is informed consent
Researchers may employ various types of deception, including misleading participants about the true purpose of a study, providing false information, or omitting certain details to maintain the integrity of the research. These techniques are often used to prevent bias and ensure that participants' behaviors and responses are genuine and not influenced by their awareness of the study's aims. Deception can help create more realistic situations that reflect natural behaviors, ultimately enhancing the validity of the findings. However, ethical guidelines require that such practices be justified and that participants are debriefed afterward.
Please be more specific.
I think Deception & Armageddon.