A statue is considered a secondary source because it is typically a representation or interpretation of an idea, person, or event rather than a direct artifact from the time it depicts. Unlike primary sources, which provide firsthand evidence (like documents, photographs, or objects from that era), a statue reflects the artist's perspective, cultural context, and purpose, making it a product of later interpretation. It can still offer valuable insights into the time and place of its creation, but it does not serve as an original record of historical events.
what
The statue was created in the time Octavian Augustus was emperor. A primary source is direct evidence from people who lived in that time period. In this case the direct evidence is a statue and it is the history of a person. The statue is direct evidence so it is a primary source.
This is a secondary source.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
It is a secondary source.
Secondary source
secondary
an newspaper article will be an secondary source
Magazine articles are secondary sources
It is a good idea to confirm your data with a secondary source.
is pericles primary source or secondary source
When it comes to the reliability of a secondary source you need to document your use of this source. You also need to not have an over-reliance on a secondary source.