In deductive grammar teaching, learners are given rules and statements about grammar up front and asked to apply them.
In inductive grammar teaching, learners are not given the rules up front, but rather learn from trying different things, seeing what works and what does not. Through experimenting they figure out the grammatical rules on their own.
Deductive grammar teaching involves presenting grammar rules first before practice, while inductive grammar teaching involves providing examples for students to analyze and discover the rules themselves. Deductive teaching is more teacher-centered and emphasizes explicit instruction, whereas inductive teaching is more student-centered and focuses on promoting learner autonomy and discovery of language patterns.
Both of these methods date back to the 17th century, and are used to teach foreign languages to students. The grammar translation method was used to teach languages such as Greek and Latin, but did not teach communication skills. The direct method focuses on teaching communication skills along with the language.
implicit grammar is learned naturally without effort as toddlers through conversation and exposure to the language. explicit grammar is learned in the classroom when someone makes a conscious effort to learn a language.
Teaching grammar is important as it helps individuals communicate effectively, understand the structure of language, and improve writing skills. Knowing grammar rules can also enhance clarity and precision in written and spoken communication. It provides a foundation for mastering language skills and fosters better comprehension and expression.
A text-based approach to language teaching focuses on using written material as the main source of instruction. This approach involves analyzing and interpreting texts to develop vocabulary, grammar, and comprehension skills. It encourages students to engage with authentic texts to improve their language proficiency.
Deductive grammar teaching involves presenting grammar rules first before practice, while inductive grammar teaching involves providing examples for students to analyze and discover the rules themselves. Deductive teaching is more teacher-centered and emphasizes explicit instruction, whereas inductive teaching is more student-centered and focuses on promoting learner autonomy and discovery of language patterns.
Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as a "top down" approach, in other words deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. It often starts with a theory and is then narrowed down to an actual, testable hypothesis, that can be confirmed or denied by observation. Inductive reasoning is the inverse approach, a "bottom up" approach. It begins with an observation and through observation patterns and regularities are observed and can be applied to a more generalized theory.
William W. Lamb has written: 'Inductive French grammar' -- subject(s): French language, Grammar
Yes, teaching grammar in a formal manner can be valuable in helping students understand the structure and rules of language. However, it is important to balance formal grammar instruction with opportunities for students to apply their knowledge in authentic contexts to promote meaningful learning.
Stacey L. Katz has written: 'Teaching French grammar in context' -- subject(s): French language, Study and teaching, Grammar
Alfred Holbrook has written: 'The normal' -- subject(s): Accessible book 'An English grammar conformed to present usage' -- subject(s): Grammar, English language 'The normal' -- subject(s): Teaching, Grammar, English language 'The normal; or, Methods of teaching the common branches, orthoepy, orthography, grammar, geography, arithmetic and elocution ..' -- subject(s): Teaching
William Kuo has written: 'Teaching Grammar of Thai' -- subject(s): Grammar, Thai language
The Grammar Translation Method may be used for teaching foreign languages. It involves stressing the grammar of the foreign language and teaching learners to translate from their mother tongue into the foreign language and vice versa. It is by far the most effective method of foreign language teaching is the aim is a high level of precision and accuracy in the foreign language.
Traditional grammar teaches a language while linguistics explains the nature of a language. Linguistics is a study of a language while traditional grammar is the teaching of a language.
Richard A. Hudson has written: 'Impact resistance of foam filled structures' 'Conjunction reduction, gappinng hacking and the preservation of surface structure' -- subject(s): Comparative and general Grammar, English language, Generative grammar, Grammar, Comparative and general, Grammar, Generative, Syntax 'Arguments for a non-transformational grammar' -- subject(s): Comparative and general Grammar, Dependency grammar, Generative grammar, Grammar, Comparative and general 'Kuboyama and the saga of the Lucky Dragon' 'English complex sentences' -- subject(s): English language, Generative grammar, Grammar, Generative, Sentences 'Teaching Grammar' -- subject(s): Study and teaching, Grammar, English language
I've never heard of an English grammar license. Teachers are required to have teaching certificates but I've never heard of such a specific narrow field as English grammar.
Leon Zawadowski has written: 'Inductive semantics and syntax' -- subject(s): Comparative and general Grammar, Linguistics, Semantics