Eugenics is an attempt to directly influence the coarse of human evolution by artificially selecting the pool of breeding partners and the resultant offspring. In effect, the methods are little different from those used in the breeding of cattle. One can model the outcome of such an experiment by applying evolutionary theory, genetics, to the parameters of the experiment. Other than that, there's no real linkage between eugenics and evolutionary theory.
Charles Darwin is primarily associated with the theory of evolution through his work on natural selection and the publication of "On the Origin of Species." Other scientists, such as Alfred Russel Wallace, also contributed to the development of evolutionary theory.
The theory of evolution was formulated by Charles Darwin in the mid-19th century, with his seminal work "On the Origin of Species" published in 1859. Darwin proposed the concept of natural selection as the mechanism driving the process of evolution.
Darwin's theory of evolution is a valid yet unproven theory.
In the scientific sense of the word 'theory' (ie. testable explanatory model), there is just the one theory of evolution: evolutionary theory, which incorporates the central theses of common descent and natural selection.
Tennessee passed the Butler Act in 1925, which prohibited the teaching of any theory that denied the biblical account of creation, including evolution. This led to the famous Scopes Monkey Trial, where a high school teacher was prosecuted for teaching evolution.
Eugenics, positive and negative, is a program that proposed to breed superior humans and halt the breeding of so called inferior humans. Eugenics means " good genes " and really has nothing to do with Darwin, his theory or biological evolution. Francis Galton, a cousin of Darwin's, came up with this concept and Darwin had nothing and wanted nothing to do with this program.
It is not linked to the theory of evolution by natural selection. Can not put it any simpler than that Eugenics, " good genes " was linked to early geneticists who though that it would be simple to promote breeding among those " genetically favored " and repress breeding among those " genetically disfavored. "The obvious mistake was group selection as opposed to the individual selection of Darwin's theory. For straight additive traits eugenics might work, but all the " interesting " traits in humans are the result of polyploidy. So, one would not real;ly know what is being selected for when so many genes contribute to a trait. This does not even get into sexual recombination which we see putting out many variant siblings in the same family, so eugenics fails on several fronts. So far.
Charles Darwin did not directly address eugenics in his work on evolution. However, some individuals later used his theory of natural selection to support eugenics, the idea of improving the human population through selective breeding. This interpretation of Darwin's work contributed to the development of eugenics as a concept in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Darwin's theory of evolution was just that, a theory. Darwin himself said that if he was correct, it would be proven in the fossil record. It has not been proven in the fossil record to date. I am not certain what Darwin's theory of evolution has to do with the way religious and business leaders view their responsibility toward the poor. Several political situations can be linked to various political leaders and their exposure to Darwinism, including the Holocaust, Marxism, Communism, and Eugenics.
Francis Galton developed the theory of Eugenics
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, which proposed that species evolve through natural selection, influenced the development of eugenics by providing a scientific basis for the idea of improving the human race through selective breeding. Eugenicists believed that by controlling reproduction, they could enhance desirable traits and eliminate undesirable ones, leading to a "better" human population. This connection between Darwin's theory and eugenics contributed to the promotion of eugenics as a legitimate scientific concept in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
No Darwin's theory was not directly linked to classification .
Charles Darwin's beliefs on eugenics notwithstanding, his theory is generally accepted as fact by a large portion of the scientific community.
No. Adolf Hitler's Endlösung was the product of an insane brain, inspired by a long religious tradition of anti-semitism that goes back centuries.
Some synonyms are: stirpiculture, bioscience, reproductive engineering, assisted evolution.
Theory of evolution refers to animals and plants evolution along the time. Language evolution is another issue, not entirely related to the theory of evolution. It follows the theory of evolution on some way but it is related to culture evolution, not to the physical attributes evolution.
Eugenics is a theory that by selecting humans for breeding according to race, health, etc. it is possible to create a race of people that is superior to others. Unfortunately, many ethical issues arise when eugenics is involved. Often times it is associated with racism, involves selective sterilization, and can even go as far as to suggest the euthanasia of people who aren't useful for the gene pool. I've written an interesting commentary on my site on one particular physicians opinion that happens to be based in eugenics.