William H Seward
The Higher Law doctrine stated that slavery should be excluded from the territories as contrary to a divine moral law standing above even the Constitution. Senator Seward proposed this doctrine in 1851.
"Argued out of his position" means that someone was persuaded or convinced to change their stance or opinion as a result of a compelling argument put forth by another person.
A debatable position is a stance or viewpoint on a topic that can be argued or challenged by others. It is a position that is not universally accepted and is open to discussion, disagreement, or differing perspectives.
Albert Bandura is a psychologist who emphasized the importance of observational learning in his Social Learning Theory. Bandura argued that individuals can learn new behaviors by observing others and then imitating those actions.
The theory of comparative advantage was presented by economist David Ricardo in the early 19th century. Ricardo argued that countries should specialize in producing goods and services in which they have a lower opportunity cost, and then trade with other countries to maximize overall production and consumption.
John C. Calhoun
John C. Calhoun
John C. Calhoun
The abolitionists fought against the expansion of slavery and believed that it was morally wrong. They advocated for the end of slavery and argued that free labor was more beneficial for the economy. This movement played a significant role in shaping the debate over slavery in the United States.
Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas was a prominent proponent of the idea of popular sovereignty in the mid-19th century. He argued that the residents of a territory should determine whether to allow slavery within their borders, a concept central to the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This approach aimed to address the contentious issue of slavery's expansion in the United States, but it ultimately led to significant conflict and violence, particularly in Kansas.
Abolitionists and Free Soil Party members fought against the expansion of slavery into western territories. They believed that slavery was morally wrong and that free labor was more beneficial for the economy. They argued that allowing the spread of slavery would inhibit the growth and development of the western territories.
compromises over slavery
The two primary participants in the great debate over slavery prior to the election of 1858 were Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln. Douglas, a Democratic senator from Illinois, advocated for popular sovereignty, allowing territories to decide on the legality of slavery. In contrast, Lincoln, representing the Republican Party, argued against the expansion of slavery into new territories and emphasized the moral and political issues surrounding it. Their debates during the Illinois Senate race in 1858 highlighted the deepening divisions over slavery in the United States.
He came out of retirement due to his weighing in on the Dred Scott decision. He argued that the Constitution did not affirm a right to own slaves and that there was a conspiracy to extend slavery into the territories.
A bit ?? Slavery was 100 % race related.
Pro-slavery Southerners viewed Manifest Destiny as a justification for the expansion of the United States, particularly into territories where slavery could be established or expanded. They believed that spreading slavery was not only a right but also a means to promote their economic interests and way of life. Additionally, they argued that the expansion of the United States would fulfill a divine mission, positioning slavery as integral to this national destiny. This belief fueled their desire for territorial acquisition, particularly in the West.
They argued that slavery contributed to the prosperous economy.