0
None. The inclusion of creationism into the educational curriculum has created the incorrect perception that creationism is a science-based theory which is "just as valid" as evolutionism.
However, evolutionism has solid theories that explain the entire evolution of the human species from the very beginning of life on Earth, backed up by independent research, subjected to open peer review.
Creationism on the other hand has no substantiated evidence that would be accepted outside of its "selective" peer review - i.e. creationist "evidence" is only validated by supporters of creationism. Furthermore, creationism does not explain the origin of the universe or the evolutionary footprints in our DNA with anything more than "God did it".
In the scientific method, a theory has to withstand research, objective observation and peer review before it deemed worthy the title of theory. Theories can have strong opposition during their development within the scientific community, but in the end, if a theory fits all the facts, it will be accepted even by its strongest opponents if they adhere to the scientific method (as was the case with Darwin's theory of evolution).
Since neither independent research, independent observations or open peer review have been possible or permitted on the statements of creationism, most scientists regard it as pseudo-science and therefore unworthy of being included in the educational curriculum of democratic nations where religion (a private practice) and education (a public service) are supposed to be separated by the very foundations of their constitutions.
What else can I help you with?
Should public schools teach creationism alongside evolution in science classes?
No. Teaching creationism alongside evolutionary theory would suggest that they are equivalent explanations. They are not. Evolutionary theory is a well-established scientific model; creationism is a religious myth, and should be taught as such.
What are the pros and cons of teaching creationism in school?
There are numerous pros attached to teaching children about creationism. After all, we live in a world in which a great majority of the people are still religious, and believe, to various degrees, in a world that was created by their particular deity. It cannot harm children to learn what religious beliefs other people have, as long as they are not themselves pressured to believe the same.There are also numerous cons attached to teaching children creationism as if it were a true story. After all, the children would then be asked to believe something for no good reason, which would seriously impair their critical thinking skills, and obstruct further education.
What is the current status of the teaching of evolution and creationism?
Most western nations have a policy of separation of church and state, meaning that it is illegal to conduct religious indoctrination in public schools. That means that while evolution often is a part of the biology curriculum, teaching creationism as if it were true is illegal in state funded schools.
Why should creationism not be taught in school?
There is no legitimate reason for not teaching aboutcreationism. To deny students knowledge of common religious beliefs is cencorship. Creationism should be taught in schools - or rather, schools should inform students about creationism, explaining that there exist various religious subcultures that hold their creation stories to be literal truth.
Why is creationism not taught in schools?
The United States Supreme Court has defined creationism as a religious hypothesis, which should be taught only as part of religious education. It is not permitted to be taught in science courses.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Is teaching creationism illegal?
Creationism is the basis of all religions, it is what science says is not true. Teaching it in a public school is illegal.
Should public schools teach creationism alongside evolution in science classes?
No. Teaching creationism alongside evolutionary theory would suggest that they are equivalent explanations. They are not. Evolutionary theory is a well-established scientific model; creationism is a religious myth, and should be taught as such.
What are the pros and cons of teaching creationism in school?
There are numerous pros attached to teaching children about creationism. After all, we live in a world in which a great majority of the people are still religious, and believe, to various degrees, in a world that was created by their particular deity. It cannot harm children to learn what religious beliefs other people have, as long as they are not themselves pressured to believe the same.There are also numerous cons attached to teaching children creationism as if it were a true story. After all, the children would then be asked to believe something for no good reason, which would seriously impair their critical thinking skills, and obstruct further education.
Are atheists for or against the teaching of creationism v evolution?
'Atheists' are a general grouping, not a specific one.Many have no opinion on the subject, and allow expert opinions to weigh the matter on their behalf.Some refuse the admission of creationism in public education as science (although private education may do what it pleases) because it is inherently unscientific and in many places, illegal to do so. Evolution is accepted because of its scientific support.Others make acceptance for creationism taught in religious classes, which is fair enough.
Which states use creationism in biology curriculum?
None. In 1987 the Supreme Court of the United States of America heard the case of Edwards v. Aguillard, which argued that a Louisiana law requiring the teaching of creationism along side evolution was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court agreed.
Are there questions about creationism on standardized tests?
There are unlikely to be questions about creationism in standardized tests, unless the subject for the tests is religion.For more information about creationism and its relationship to traditional religion and to the teaching of science, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What is the current status of the teaching of evolution and creationism?
Most western nations have a policy of separation of church and state, meaning that it is illegal to conduct religious indoctrination in public schools. That means that while evolution often is a part of the biology curriculum, teaching creationism as if it were true is illegal in state funded schools.
What Benefits of doing a survey of available materials in teaching Aids?
The benefits of doing a survey of available materials in teaching aids enable the teacher to examine documents to compile the best method of teaching. These materials will help create an appropriate teaching structure.
Why should creationism not be taught in school?
There is no legitimate reason for not teaching aboutcreationism. To deny students knowledge of common religious beliefs is cencorship. Creationism should be taught in schools - or rather, schools should inform students about creationism, explaining that there exist various religious subcultures that hold their creation stories to be literal truth.
What are some retirement benefits for teaching?
money and money
Is scientific Creationism is example of applied science?
Technically, there is no such thing as scientific creationism. Creationism is per definition un- or even anti-scientific.
Benefits have scoring rubrics brought to the learning-teaching process?
One of the benefits of scoring rubrics in the teaching-learning process is that students can effectively visualize what they have to do to earn the grade they want.
