nothing, my dad
Personal-situational theory is a psychological theory that suggests behavior is influenced by a combination of personal traits and situational factors. It emphasizes that both internal (personal) and external (situational) factors contribute to an individual's actions and can interact in complex ways to determine behavior. This theory aims to understand how individual differences and environmental conditions impact behavior.
The best leadership theory depends on the context and situation. Some popular theories include transformational leadership, situational leadership, and servant leadership. Each theory has its strengths and weaknesses, so it's important for leaders to understand and apply the most suitable theory for their specific circumstances.
The Contingency theory has many different strengths and weaknesses such as: Strengths: * Empirical Research: many researchers have tested it and was proven valid and reliable approach to explaining how leadership can be achieved. * Has a broadened understanding of leadership by forcing us to consider the impact of situations on leaders. * Predictive, so therefore provides useful information about the type of leadership * Does not require that people are effective in all situations. * Data collected from this theory can be useful for developing leadership profiles. Limitation: * It has been criticised because it has failed to explain fully why people with certain leadership styles are more effective in some situations then others. * The second is the LPC(Least Preferred Co worker) scale, because it did not seem valid on the surface. * Lastly, It fails to explain adequately what organisations should do when there is a mismatch between the leader and the situation in the workplace. Hope this helps.
The situational leadership theory is a theory developed by professor and author Paul Hersey concerning effective leadership methods. The theory states that there is not a single correct leadership approach, but that different situations require different leadership and that a good leader adapts to what is needed.
Applying situational theory in an organization can help leaders adapt their leadership style to fit the specific needs of a situation or team, leading to improved performance and employee satisfaction. It allows for flexibility in decision-making and problem-solving, enhancing the organization's ability to navigate complex and dynamic environments.
Personal-situational theory is a psychological theory that suggests behavior is influenced by a combination of personal traits and situational factors. It emphasizes that both internal (personal) and external (situational) factors contribute to an individual's actions and can interact in complex ways to determine behavior. This theory aims to understand how individual differences and environmental conditions impact behavior.
The theory that leaders are not born, but can be trained as leaders, and that a leader can change behaviors based on situational or follower characteristics or contingencies.
The best leadership theory depends on the context and situation. Some popular theories include transformational leadership, situational leadership, and servant leadership. Each theory has its strengths and weaknesses, so it's important for leaders to understand and apply the most suitable theory for their specific circumstances.
what are the strengths and weakness of modernization theory
what are the stengths and limitations of psychiatric classification systems
Strengths of Rostow's theory of production
give the limitations of cardinal utility theory
Empowerment seeks to emphasize strengths and capacities and increasing.
Strengths of the model: shows accurate organs and inhale and and exhale. Limitations: cant adjust to human conditions, doesn't show change over time.
The Contingency theory has many different strengths and weaknesses such as: Strengths: * Empirical Research: many researchers have tested it and was proven valid and reliable approach to explaining how leadership can be achieved. * Has a broadened understanding of leadership by forcing us to consider the impact of situations on leaders. * Predictive, so therefore provides useful information about the type of leadership * Does not require that people are effective in all situations. * Data collected from this theory can be useful for developing leadership profiles. Limitation: * It has been criticised because it has failed to explain fully why people with certain leadership styles are more effective in some situations then others. * The second is the LPC(Least Preferred Co worker) scale, because it did not seem valid on the surface. * Lastly, It fails to explain adequately what organisations should do when there is a mismatch between the leader and the situation in the workplace. Hope this helps.
the limitations of the conventionalism theory is that it is objective, so basically there is only one answer or point of view.
there will be conflicts between the members of the org. because others may not understand the behavior of their group member