Discussion helps people to share ideas. Instead of a lecture or a monologue, which is one person presenting information or expressing ideas, discussion involves at least two people, and often more. It is especially important when people have different backgrounds and experiences about the subject of the discussion, because you can get many perspectives. It is hard for one person to, alone, imagine other perspectives, and so a discussion aids in that... and when we learn to see things through other people's eyes, then we become wiser and more compassionate in general... as well as more knowledgable about the specific subject discussed. Looking at group dynamics, it also helps the members of the group feel valued if they all have a chance to offer input and suggestions. Allowing people to participate enhances attention and a feeling of ownership... thus enhancing learning in general. Even in a strictly interpersonal context, sharing ideas and coming to conclusions together is much better for the relationship than if one person makes all of the decisions... even when the decisions are exactly the same. Participation and a sense of ownership and responsibility make all the difference.
A debatable position is a stance or viewpoint on a topic that can be argued or challenged by others. It is a position that is not universally accepted and is open to discussion, disagreement, or differing perspectives.
One effective technique is to provide a clear agenda or outline at the beginning of the discussion, highlighting the key topics that need to be covered. Encouraging active participation and facilitation can also help steer the conversation towards the most important points. Additionally, summarizing key points and revisiting them at the end of the discussion can reinforce their significance.
A qualitative method to obtain in-depth information on concepts and perceptions about a certain topic through spontaneous group discussion of approximately 6-12 persons, guided by a facilitator.
Key ideas are the main concepts or points that are crucial to understanding a topic or argument. They are often the fundamental principles or themes that guide the overall discussion or analysis of a subject. Identifying key ideas helps to summarize and grasp the core message or purpose of a piece of writing or discussion.
Some disadvantages of the Socratic method during a discussion include potential for the conversation to become long-winded or overly focused on questioning rather than reaching conclusions. It can also lead to frustration if participants feel like the conversation is not progressing towards a resolution. Additionally, it requires strong facilitation to ensure all voices are heard and the discussion stays on track.
If the links in Wiki discussion pages are nofollowed it will give no SEO value (for Google). In either case Wiki discussion pages are of great value building relationship and trust with many other people.
For further detail see the discussion page.
See discussion, please.
This coin's value depends on how it was misstruck. Detailed information can be placed in this question's Discussion section by clicking on "Discuss Question" to the left.
See discussion page for correct answer. Bad answer removed by Supervisor.
Its just to call a WinAPI function or other functios with a value or a pointer.... Well, this is not an answer to a posted question. See discussion.
Most, but especially any of the bottom two rows.
See discussion page for description.
what discussion
A long discussion goes on for a lengthy amount of time. A prolonged discussion goes on for more time than expected. A prolonged discussion can be 20 minutes as long as the discussion was supposed to be less than that.
As per our discussion with you on discussion
A long discussion goes on for a lengthy amount of time. A prolonged discussion goes on for more time than expected. A prolonged discussion can be 20 minutes as long as the discussion was supposed to be less than that.