0
Creationism is currently taught in the public education system as a philosophical belief. As such, it is taught in mythology, philosophy, and literature classes.
It currently has no place in science classes because it is not supported by scientific evidence.
Until creationism is supported by actual evidence, it should continue being taught just as it is.
What else can I help you with?
How should evolution and creationism be taught in schools?
Evolution can be taught in public schools because it is a verifiable scientific fact based on evidence. Creationism cannot be taught (at least, not as fact) in schools in the United States because it is a religious doctrine, and the Constitution says that Church and State must remain independent from one another. One is of course free to teach about creationism, for instance in comparative religion courses.
Who contributed public schools in the Philippines?
Public schools in the Philippines were established during the American colonial period, particularly through the efforts of Thomasites—American teachers who were sent to the Philippines to help establish a public education system. These teachers played a significant role in shaping the Philippine education system and promoting a modern system of education in the country.
Who was the major promoter of an effective tax supported system of public education?
Horace Mann is often considered the major promoter of an effective tax-supported system of public education in the United States. As the Secretary of the Massachusetts Board of Education in the mid-19th century, he advocated for universal, non-sectarian education funded by tax dollars to ensure that all children had access to schooling regardless of their background. Mann played a crucial role in shaping the modern American public education system.
Why shouldn't creationism be taught in public schools?
There are two questions here, one explicit and one implicit:The first addresses whether the concept of creationism should be taught in public schools in some class.The second concerns whether or not creationism should be taught in a science class.The answer to either has NOTHING to do with the theory of evolution.Let's address the second question first, because it's the easiest to answer.Creationism absolutely should never be taught in a science class. The reason has nothing to do with the subject matter; it has to do with Creationism not being a scientific theory. In order for an idea to be science (and consequently, have a scientific theory constructed around it), it must follow certain rules: there must be experimentally verifiable assertions made, and the theory as a whole must be constructed using these (testable) assertions combined with the reproducible experimental data. That is, science consists of making an assertion that can be proven FALSE, and then making a sufficient amount of tests to either prove that assertion false, or increase the confidence that the assertion is true (as a scientific theory is based on a preponderance of evidence, and cannot be shown "true" in the same way a mathematical proof can be).Creationism cannot produce these testable conditions. There is no test that can be run to show whether there is a God (or Intelligent Designer) or not - that is, Creationism is rooted in faith (a form of, by definition, baseless belief), which cannot be used in science. Thus, Creationism is a form of faith/religion, not a scientific theory, and cannot be taught in a science class. You can't teach Philosophy in Science class.The first (explicit) interpretation of the question is more tricky, as it concerns the content of Creationism as a belief system. Creationism is inherently a Christian faith system; while it is possible to structure Creationism as some form of general monotheistic belief, the literature and supporting movements of the system are derived (and almost exclusively practiced) by those of a Christian faith.As a form of religious faith, teaching such a subject in a public school - which has a duty as a government-sponsored institution not to promote one religion over others - can be tricky.Legally speaking, it is possible to teach Creationism in a class where the context is sociology and/or philosophy, and where the discussion and study is not "accept this as true", but more "analyze what this says and why, and look at the roots of where it came from." It would NOT be possible to teach this in any way which endorsed Creationism as "truth" or which judged people according to their adherence to its tenants, because in both situations, it would be the school (aka government) promoting the views of a specific religion over those of others not of that religion.Thus, it could be entirely appropriate to discuss Creationism in a Comparative Religions class, or Western Philosophy class, or even a Sociology class. It might even be possible to be taught to younger kids in a Social Studies class. That is, you could "teach" Creationism in the same way you would "teach" Shakespeare or Ayn Rand. The prime point is that Creationism cannot be presented as accepted fact, or as supported by fact.Whether or not it would be beneficial to students that such a subject be taught is left up to your local community to decide.
What social reformer advocated for public schools?
Horace Mann, an American educator and politician, advocated for public schools as a way to provide education for all children regardless of their background. He believed that public education was essential for creating a more equal and democratic society. Mann's efforts laid the foundation for the development of the public education system in the United States.
How should evolution and creationism be taught in schools?
Evolution can be taught in public schools because it is a verifiable scientific fact based on evidence. Creationism cannot be taught (at least, not as fact) in schools in the United States because it is a religious doctrine, and the Constitution says that Church and State must remain independent from one another. One is of course free to teach about creationism, for instance in comparative religion courses.
Does Barack Obama think his daughters would get the same quality of education in the public system?
Yes,everyone should have the rights!
What did people see public education as a tool for in 1900?
People desipised those who were educated from the public education system during this time. They thought that public education was for the poor and was looked down upon.
Why didn't Napoleon not accomplish an equal opportunity of public education system?
no education for women and the poor had less education
What best describes the public education system that existed in the US before educational reform began in the 1830s?
Public education was not widely available.
Would a national system of public education help eliminate poverty?
No.
Is the public education system losing qualified and moral teachers?
yes
Does the state have the primary responsibility for financing the system of public education?
Yes
Who runs the public school system in New Jersey?
The public school system in New Jersey is run by the New Jersey Board of Education.
What is quality education?
Quality education is the education our children should get from our public school systems. When they are done with K-12 and enter college, they are well prepared because the public school system made it possible.Quality Education in schools aims to maximize potential of a student and lets him develop, learn and grow through experience based learning.
Who contributed public schools in the Philippines?
Public schools in the Philippines were established during the American colonial period, particularly through the efforts of Thomasites—American teachers who were sent to the Philippines to help establish a public education system. These teachers played a significant role in shaping the Philippine education system and promoting a modern system of education in the country.
What was not a way the American education system expanded in the years after the Revolution?
introduction of free public education for all children
