Aristotle's theory was taught for so long due to his immense influence in shaping Western philosophy, science, and logic. His ideas were foundational in many fields and were seen as authoritative for centuries. Additionally, his works were preserved and disseminated by Islamic scholars during the Middle Ages, further extending his legacy.
The best leadership theory depends on the context and situation. Some popular theories include transformational leadership, situational leadership, and servant leadership. Each theory has its strengths and weaknesses, so it's important for leaders to understand and apply the most suitable theory for their specific circumstances.
Cultural theory is a multidisciplinary field, so it does not have a single inventor. However, scholars such as Raymond Williams, Stuart Hall, and Pierre Bourdieu have been influential in developing cultural theory as a way to explore the relationship between culture, power, and society.
Cell theory was developed by the scientist because of it's simplicity complicated value, they found out more about cell. So a cell theory was developed.
The most important quantum field theories are: *QED (quantum electrodynamics) the field theory of electromagnetic interaction, *QCD (quantum chromodynamics) the theory of the strong interaction of quarks and gluons. *The electroweak theory, which combines the so called weak interaction with QED *And of course the Standard Model of particle physics And many others...
While they both hold a high percentage of political power, Elite Theory has a small "elite" group of individuals, groups, and industries while hyperpluralism has a group of people who share a common interest.
Aristotle died approx 1500 years before the tower was begun, so it's pretty unlikely he had a theory about it.
No, he died long before Jesus was born so could not be Catholic
Oh, dude, Aristotle didn't actually discover the Atomic theory. That was Democritus back in ancient Greece, like way before Aristotle was even a thing. So, yeah, Aristotle was more into other stuff like philosophy and biology, not so much the tiny building blocks of matter.
Aristotle was an empiricist. So, no he was not a nativist.
He stated that an object can not be cut down forever, and you will reach a smallest quantity eventually. Aristotle disapproved, so no one listened.
Aristotle developed a theory that the earth was the center of the universe, and all the planets were attached to it via fifty-five invisible spheres. The moon was close enough to be within the earth's realm, and as a result, possessed the ability to go through phases. He believed these spheres were made up of a substance he called Aether.
Most likely due to the fact that there was little proven science at the time so an explanation for something, that at the time had no reason for even existing, made sense.
Aristotle was a Macedonian Greek, so best assumption (as there were no race classifications 2000 years ago) is that he was what is by today' s standards a "Melanochroi Caucasion".
horses are coooool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..........................HORSES
Aristotle was an ancient Greek philosopher; this word (phil = lover, sophos = wisdom) to the Greeks meant all branches of learning, so yes, Aristotle was a scientist.
Because there wasn't enough eveidence for any other classification, meaning that people had to stick with this one for now
they thought he was stupid until he proved it with his invention of the telescope