No. Worldwide, about 20% of electric power is hydro. In the 1940s and 1950s, the cost of fossil fuels was so cheap that hydro was not competitive, but since the 1970s, the costs of fossil fuels have risen, so hydro is economically attractive.
Today, hydroelectric power is the single largest source of renewable energy. Of all renewable sources, hydro accounts for 97% of the energy produced, while wind, solar, geothermal and biomass combined are only 3%.
The only problem is that hydro doesn't have much potential for growth. Most of the good large dam sites have already been developed.
no.
no
The costs of biomass can be prohibitive for common use due to factors such as collection, transportation, and processing, which can vary significantly based on location and availability of feedstock. Additionally, the infrastructure required for biomass energy production can involve substantial investment, making it less competitive compared to other energy sources like natural gas or renewables. However, advancements in technology and economies of scale may reduce these costs over time, potentially increasing its accessibility.
Yes, because you have to make a river come to the area to make a dam work with make hydro power.
Well it is in common use, amounting to nearly 20% in the US. These are old plants though, the costs under present day economic conditions may prevent more plants being built.
do you gyus no if you need electricty to make hydroelectricity
no
The cost of certain technologies can indeed make them prohibitive for common use, particularly if they require expensive materials, specialized manufacturing processes, or extensive infrastructure. Additionally, ongoing maintenance and operational costs can further limit accessibility for average consumers. However, as technology advances and economies of scale are achieved, prices often decrease, making them more accessible over time. Ultimately, the balance between innovation, affordability, and consumer demand plays a crucial role in determining widespread adoption.
Cost prohibitive
The cost of hydropower can be high due to the significant upfront investment required for infrastructure, such as dams and turbines. However, once operational, hydropower plants typically have low ongoing operational costs and provide a stable and reliable energy source. In many regions, the long-term benefits and lower costs compared to fossil fuels can make hydropower a viable option for common use. Nevertheless, the feasibility often depends on local geographic and economic conditions.
they do and it is called hydroelectricity currents
Hydroelectricity