no no it is not
Nuclear is about the same as fossil fuel in total costs, but more expensive to build the plant. Solar and wind power are more expensive and have to be subsidised to make them economic for power companies to use
When compared to coal and hydro. the installation cost for hydro is more at start, but maintanence cost is very less or vic versa (for thermal)
More expensive to instal, cheaper to run
less energy used
Yes. If there is any light, even on a cloudy day, a solar panel can generate power. But the amount of power generated is much less when the solar panel is not in direct sunlight (about 90% less).
You CAN rely on solar energy. It is VERY powerful and it's unlimited. In about 45 minutes, the sun delivers enough energy to power all the machines on earth for a year. The only problems are that solar panels are expensive, even though they cut down your bills and eventually pay for themselves, and we can't harness all the sun's energy yet.
The most common type of power plant is one that uses fossil fuels such as coal, oil or natural gas. Less common power plants use nuclear, geo-thermal, hydro-electric, wind, solar, or other power sources to run the plants.
solar energy can be improved by being less expensive. it also needs to reduce the ampunt of space it takes up.
less then 1%
As of 2007,* commercial amorphous Si solar cells convert about 8% of the solar energy that strikes them into electrical energy.* multicrystalline Si solar cells convert around 16% of the solar energy that strikes them into electrical energy* commercial single crystal Si solar cells convert about 22% of the solar energy that strikes them into electrical energy.So single crystal Si solar cells have the highest energy conversion efficiency.However, amorphous Si solar cells require less energy to produce and are less expensive than multicrystalline Si solar cells, which in turn require less energy to produce and are less expensive than single crystal Si solar cells.In some cases amorphous Si solar cells are more economically efficient (produce more power for the same initial price or initial investment in energy to produce).
we don't have power
Maybe solar or wind or water i dont know which is more common but i know these are quite common A2 at present hydro power is the biggest in countries that have it, otherwise wind power. In the US for example hydro is about 7% and wind is less than this, but wind power can be easily increased whilst hydro depends on suitable sites which have mostly already been exploited.