I think you mean "Cold Fusion"
It is the (currently) hypothetical nuclear fusion reaction which happens at ambient temperatures?
John M. Fowler has written: 'Fuels from wastes' -- subject(s): Biomass energy, Waste products as fuel 'Energy and the environment' 'New fuels from coal' -- subject(s): Coal gasification, Coal liquefaction 'Energy storage technology' -- subject(s): Energy storage 'Geothermal energy' -- subject(s): Geothermal resources 'Wind power' -- subject(s): Wind power 'Nuclear fusion' -- subject(s): Nuclear fusion
Anthracite coal is more common as the fusion temperature is higher and produces less clinkers (molten hardened ash deposits) on grates. Bituminous coal is usable in many applications that do not use grate systems that can be fouled by clinkers. Most coal is burned on traveling or shaking grates, however, bituminous coal can be burned in fluidized combustion bed furnaces without the clinker buildup from burning on grates.
coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal coal
Even though the idea of using controlled nuclear fusion for human benefits has been studied since the 1950s, there is still no success in controlling it. Fusion reactors, then, would have to be defined as H-bombs and stars at this point. EDIT: NONSENSE! I suggest you google Tomak. This is controlled fusion and currently best international practice will get you 10x the energy you put into it. It isn't used because it is more expensive that oil, coal and fission power.
For production of electricity, possibly yes. This won't be for 50 years at least in my opinion, and what the oil sitution will be then is difficult to forecast. There is plenty of coal available. Natural gas may run out. Nuclear fission will expand to some extent, and renewables like wind will also expand. I think there will be a mixture of fuels used as far ahead as we can imagine. Fusion would have to be much easier to do than seems likely at present, to become the main source of energy.
Nuclear energy
J. T. Rogers has written: 'An assessment of inertial fusion as a large-scale energy source' -- subject(s): Coal, Power resources
Metroid does NOT have the Fusion Suit, Metroid Fusion has the Fusion Suit, And no human on earth knows how to make a Fusion Suit.
hydrogen fusion
Coal mines, coal bins, coal hods, and anywhere coal is or was.
Answer: No it is a ball of hot gases Answer: No. The Sun gets its energy from nuclear fusion; NOT from a chemical reaction such as burning coal. The main elements in the Sun are - in that order - hydrogen and helium (more precisely, the isotopes hydrogen-1 and helium-4). There are trace amounts of carbon in the Sun, but that's not what keeps it hot.
She is with Fusion Dexter in the Fusion Tunnel to Lab at Mandark's House and Galaxy Gardens. She is spinning around Fusion Dexter in his lair at Mandark's House and the first Fusion to defeat in Fusion Dexter's lair in Galaxy Gardens