No, that's why their extinct. When no more of a certain kind are left, they can't mate to make more of their kind. :)
In my opinion, if the species went extinct because of man's activities, yes. Provided there is enough viable DNA from several specimens as not to create a genetic bottleneck. The thylacine is being considered for this now.
Extinct means the animals no longer exist so there can be no extinct animals in the Sahara. If there were, they would not be extinct.
Extinct means the animals no longer exist. There are many extinct animals, from dinosaurs to dodos.
Millions of animals have been extinct even scientist don't know the number of animals have been extinct, or the names of animals have been extinct.
Nope, because extinct animals do not exist anymore.
No, not if they are extinct.
extinct
Endangered and extinct animals are similar because endangered animals sometimes become extinct.
The Przewalski never did go completely extinct. they were bred in zoos and re-released back into their homelands. The Tarpan on the other hand went completely extinct but they have 'recreated' the breed and released it into the wild.
Animals that are extinct from the earth are animals that used to live on the earth but are all dead now. Endangered animals are almost extinct.
the extinct animals are in heaven and the endangered animals are all over the world in the wild and in zoos.
Animals go extinct for many reasons, but the main one being loss of habitat.