0
Francisella tularensis, the bacterium that causes tularemia, is not classified as "armed and dangerous" in the traditional sense. However, it is considered a potential bioweapon due to its high infectivity and the severity of the disease it can cause. In the context of public health and biosecurity, it is regarded as a potential biothreat, but it is not associated with violent actions like a dangerous individual.
What else can I help you with?
Is Yaws considered armed and dangerous?
is yaws considered armed and dangerous
Is cholera considered armed or dangerous?
Dangerous - yes. Armed - probably not
Is tetanus considered armed or dangerous?
No. Rabies is very dangerous, but it cannot be considered armed.
Is gangrene considered armed and dangerous?
No. Gangrene is the name of a disease.
Is spinal meningitis considered armed or dangerous?
bob is green
Is spinal meningitis considered armed or dangerous why?
bob is green
Is Hepatitis B considered armed and dangerous?
HIV is certainly dangerous as it causes AIDS which will eventually kill a person. However, HIV cannot be considered armed under any circumstances.
Is it chickenpox considered armed and dangerous?
Whooping cough is very dangerous for babies under 1 year, whooping cough also caused alot of deaths before there was medicine, today whooping cough is not so bad but it is bad for babies because they will not be able to breath and really they will die!
Is dysentery considered armed and dangerous?
yes very much so but there are treatments for it now
Is measles considered armed and dangerous?
Yes because it can cause stuff to ur skin!
Is plague considered armed or dangerous?
No. Leprosy (Hansen's Disease) can be dangerous under some circumstances, although it is not highly contagious. However, it cannot be considered armed. No disease can ever be "armed and dangerous."
Is botulism considered armed and dangerous?
yes its a very sirious disease and shod be treated fast
