Protecting an endangered species can temporarily alter the dynamics of natural selection by reducing the immediate pressures that drive survival and reproduction, such as predation or habitat loss. However, conservation efforts often aim to preserve genetic diversity and ecosystem balance, which can ultimately support natural selection in the long run. By ensuring that endangered species have a chance to survive and adapt, we can help maintain biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. Thus, while there may be short-term implications, the overall goal is to foster a healthier environment for all species.
The effects of upsetting natural habitats can be absolutely devastating to an animal population. These changes can disturb homes and food sources.
Its NaTuRaL sElEcTiOn if you didn't know.
Natural selection acts on variation by picking out from a population's gene pool those that are more fit to survive. More variation leads to more natural selection. For example, currently endangered cheetas are found out to have less genetic variation than other animals. As a result, if a disatrouous event occured, there are no genes that could help the cheetas survived. Thus, natural selection prevent the cheetas from reproducing as a population and they become extinct.
I'll assume you mean "tapiers". It's because their habitat is being destroyed or they're are unsuccessful and are being singled out by natural selection.
Adaptation does not allow for natural selection: natural selection causes adaptation.
The prefix of natural selection is "natural" and the suffix is "-tion".
Genetic variation in itself does not 'support' natural selection: it is what natural selection acts upon.
Natural Selection
Natural selection.
Natural selection
That selection was natural.
No, natural selection is the mechanism that drivesevolution.