Yes, for instance each sunspot on the sun is caused by separate pairs of magnetic poles poking through the sun's photosphere. No, no matter how many times you break up a magnet, it will always have a north and a south pole. No matter how small the magnet is.
why does a program consists of more than one object file in c++
It is possible to have more than one instance of the same class, because the class is simply the blue print for the actual object.
kjhkjhkhkjhjhj
Class is obviously more important than an object because an object is an instance of a class. A class may contain many objects, all of which are instances of that particular class. Class is also called the object factory because it contains all the statements needed to create an object and its attributes. A class also contains the statements that describe the operations that the created objejct will be able to perform. Therefor a class is more important and obviously come first.
Performance (since the generated code is much more than when working procedural)Memory (more memory is needed to store code and data)
oh lordy!!
Charged particles from outer space are more likely to strike Earth at the poles due to the Earth's magnetic field shaping their paths. The magnetic field lines converge at the magnetic poles, directing charged particles towards these regions. This results in a higher concentration of cosmic ray impacts at the poles compared to the equator.
The Earth has two main magnetic poles, the North Pole and the South Pole, where the magnetic field lines converge. However, there are also localized areas where the magnetic field is strong, leading to additional poles known as magnetic anomalies.
A magnetic field is generally strongest (most concentrated) at a pole. Note that, while familiar magnets have two poles, it is also possible for a magnet to have more than two. Whether a magnet could have only pole is controversial. The Earth's magnetic field is strongest at the north and south magnetic poles, which are near the north and south geographic poles. The magnetic poles move over time and are generally not located precisely at the geographic poles.
Well the above question is not true, The same object will weigh less at the equator than at the poles (of Earth). The force is the force of gravity and the effect is because the object placed at the poles will be nearer the center of the Earth than at the equator because the Earth is an Oblate Spheroid.
becouse at north &south poles the pole strength is more than other part of bar magnet so attraction is also more at poles Theoretically, magnet's lines of force - as evinced by the iron filings - encompases all universe, but, nonetheless, they meet together at the magnet's poles
The weight of an object is less at the equator compared to the poles due to the centripetal force produced by the Earth's rotation. At the equator, this force partially counteracts the force of gravity, effectively reducing the object's weight. This difference in weight is more noticeable for objects with larger mass.
The density of field lines is greater at the poles of a magnet because the magnetic field lines are closer together due to the concentrated magnetic force at the poles. This density is a visual representation of the stronger magnetic field that exists at the poles compared to other areas across the magnet.
The two sides of a magnet are called the north and south poles. Typically, the magnet is stronger at its poles rather than its sides. The strength of a magnet is usually concentrated at the poles, where the magnetic field lines are closer together and more forceful.
No, the Earth's Magnetic Field acts just like a BAR Magnetic. It has a North and South Pole and its magnetic lines of its force field are more tightly 'compressed' near the Poles than at the Equator. See the image below for an example, or Google "magnetic field lines".
Rotation.
much less