answersLogoWhite

0

First, let's look at what they mean.

Ubiquitous means everywhere. Pervasive means "diffused throughout every part of." In computing terms, those seem like somewhat similar concepts. Ubiquitous computing would be everywhere, and pervasive computing would be in all parts of your life.

That might mean the difference between seeing kiosks on every street corner and finding that you could -- or need to -- use your Palm handheld to do absolutely every information-based task.

And, in fact, that's where the difference between these two types of computing lies. Pervasive computing involves devices like handhelds -- small, easy-to-use devices -- through which we'll be able to get information on anything and everything. That's the sort of thing that Web-enabled cell phones promise. Ubiquitous computing, though, eschews our having to use computers at all. Instead, it's computing in the background, with technology embedded in the things we already use. That might be a car navigation system that, by accessing satellite pictures, alerts us to a traffic jam ahead, or an oven that shuts off when our food is cooked.

Where IBM is a leader in the pervasive computing universe -- it has a whole division, aptly called the Pervasive Computing division, devoted to it -- Xerox started the ubiquitous thing back in 1988.

Ubiquitous computing "helped kick off the recent boom in mobile computing research," notes its inventor, Mark Weiser, who came out with the concept at Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center, "although it is not the same thing as mobile computing, nor a superset nor a subset." That means that people who use ubiquitous computing to mean computing anytime, anyplace -- to describe hordes on a street corner checking their stock prices until the "walk" light comes on or efforts to dole out laptops to all students on a college campus -- aren't using the rightterm.

We don't really need to use either one. I'd be happy to call pervasive computing mobile computing, and to call ubiquitous computing embedded or invisible or transparent computing -- or even just built-in functions.

Besides, until either ubiquitous or pervasive computing is anywhere and everywhere, those alternatives seem more accurate.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the grammatic difference between compare to and compare with?

The grammatic difference between compare to and compare with is mainly that when a person compares something to something else it is different then comparing with.


How does the speed of quantum computing compare to classical computing?

Quantum computing is faster than classical computing for certain tasks due to its ability to process information in parallel and utilize quantum properties like superposition and entanglement. However, quantum computers are not universally faster than classical computers for all types of tasks.


What is the compare of these number's 92 and 79?

Do you mean the difference? The difference is 13.


What is the difference of 152?

A single number cannot have a difference - a difference is used to compare two or more numbers.


How do you compare box plots?

by looking at it and seeing the difference


What is the difference between diploma and engineering?

You can't compare the two.


Compare and contrast abrasion and deflation?

I don't know the difference.


What is the Difference between mantle and appendage?

Compare molting and metamorphos


A compare and contrast essay might have the purpose of?

A compare and contrast essay's purpose is to analyze the difference and similarities of two subjects.


What is the difference between a groyne and a seawall?

Compare and contrast seawalls and groins


What metal has 1 proton difference as compare to gold?

Platinum, Mercury


How does a rectangular prism compare to a triangular pyramid?

rectangle triangle there is a difference