0
Do you agree with the statement in this age of electronics letter writing is a dying art?
No, I would not agree. Indeed I'd say the opposite is true. With advances in technology it has become much easier and quicker to send letters all across the world, especially if we include all forms of written communication, such as e-mail, text and instant-messaging. What is a dying art is the hand-written letter rather than letter writing.
What else can I help you with?
When is it best to use a case statement instead of nested if statements and vice versa?
You would want to do this when avoiding negativity or redundent statements. For instance, when taking any kind of survey, you would not to ask any type of question-- you would want to make a statement and using a grading scale to answer that statement (strongly agree, agree, etc).
Information technology is a strategic weapon.Do you agree with this statement?
Information technology is a strategic weapon only if your competitors do not have access to the same information, if they do it becomes a strategic tool and a planning device.
What is a statement?
I don't really know that is a good question to ask a teacher or someone.
Do you agree with Michel foucault's ideas about technical writing?
Michel Foucault's ideas about technical writing can be seen as a reflection of his broader theories on knowledge and power. He emphasizes that technical writing is not just a neutral conveyance of information but is shaped by social contexts and power relations. This perspective invites a critical examination of how technical documents can influence and control knowledge dissemination. While I appreciate his insights, I also believe that technical writing can strive for clarity and objectivity, balancing Foucault's ideas with practical communication goals.
Are you agree of having a nuclear power plant?
Yes, I strongly agree.
Writing the peace treaties was never going to be easy Do you agree with this statement?
I would have to agree with the statement that writing the peace treaties was never going to be easy because there are so many people involved and it is difficult to satisfy all people with the same resolutions.
What statement is grammatically correct I agree with your or I am agree with You?
The statement "I agree with you" is correct. "Am" is not needed in this context because "agree" already indicates the present tense.
Do you agree or disagree with the statement anyone can cook?
I do agree with the statement that anyone can cook.
How do you reply the letter of intent?
How you reply to a letter of intent depends on how you plan to address the letter. If you agree to the terms, you can simply write a short statement indicating the proposed terms are acceptable. If you do not, you may want to draft a short statement suggesting modifications.
Do you agree that mission statement provides a substantive guidance and a vision statement provides inspirational guidance?
Yes, I agree.
When woodes rogers arrived in the Bahamas the colony was in a bad state do you agree withthis statement?
it was in very bad state and i agree with that statement
What might contribute to an author's biased opinion?
An author might have his own viewpoint of things and doesn't really agree with things being said in either a statement or a peiece of writing.
Do you agree of disagree with this statement''the history of judaism is also the history of the Hebrew people?
I agree with it.
Do you agree with the authors statement at the end of the text What scientefic explanation or concept do you know that may justify the statement?
do you agree with the author s statement at the end of the text? what scientific explanation or concept do you know that may justify the statement?
Do you agree with the statement president Jackson was a people president?
no
Marketing Manager's job is dichotomous do you agree with the statement how they deal with these dual roles?
Answering "Marketing Manager's job is dichotomous do you agree with the statement how they deal with these dual roles?"
How you use necessarily in a sentence?
I don't necessarily agree with your statement.
