Clones are produced by asexual reproduction. There's only one parent.
an individual produced asexually by binary fission
No you would not get hurt.
not personally, but it has been done.
One would hope that if cloning were allowed, the clones would be defined as people. If they are people then they should have the same rights as people who are not cloned. If people who are not cloned have the right to clone themselves then those who are should have it as well. The word "right" can have a legal and an ethical aspect. The question might be talking about whether the practice is legal or whether it is moral. The Legal Profession treats that sort of question as money in the Bank and will vigorously defend you right to your opinion. The Religious Ethics community will likely oppose any such question until they have debated the question for several years.
thee down falls of cloning are the dark parts of a clone....a clone of a dog or human may be bad...misfitted...or mis-shaped
clone. Clone is the answer!
asexual reproduction
asexual reproduction creates clones.
A clone.
An organism that has the same genes as the organism from which it was produced is called a clone. Cloning is the process of creating an exact genetic copy of an organism.
Because the cytoplasm of the clone is not the same as the parent animal.
You are describing a clone.
She was the first complete genetic clone ever produced.
by tissue culture method
clone
The "Clone Wars" movie was released to video in the year 2008. The film called "Clone Wars" was directed by a man named Dave Filoni and was produced by George Lucas.
yes as it is a type of asexual rep.